The Mass Shooting and Liberal Utopian Society
Written by: Pastor Andrew Isker
Sent to me via email entitled: Modern America is a Factory for Psychopaths
In the last two weeks, there have been two mass shootings in the United States, and the second took place this week at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas. These shootings have reignited the regime’s already intense desire for a disarmed populace. Even before the bodies of the dead children had been removed from the school, our mentally diminished President spoke to the nation, demanding that rifles (which he is not even able to accurately describe) be confiscated across a 330 million person country spanning an entire continent.
This despicable man, and the legion of sociopathic ghouls arrayed behind him, are clearly overjoyed that there is a classroom full of young children lying dead in Texas. They don’t actually care about the anguish of parents who will never see their child grow up. Their deaths are merely a political prop for the most evil people on the planet.
It is hard to fully comprehend just how totalitarian such designs are. But these are the very same sadistic freaks who successfully locked those 330 million people in their homes for weeks or months, and then (mostly successfully) restricted their ability to provide for their families if they refused to get an extremely dangerous mRNA injection that does not even accomplish its intended purpose. All you are to them is a guinea pig or a rat in a social experiment. You do not matter. Your children do not matter. You only exist to provide them with power.
You must understand that school shooters and other mass shooters are an extremely acute symptom of the disease that horribly afflicts the American nation. You live in an incredibly sick society, and since you are born into it and live in it every day, you go about your life mostly unaware of just how dreadful things really are. It is imperative for the people who manufacture the inversion of reality that you perceive everything through the lens of the now.
This is why “The Current Thing” has such memetic power: it attacks reality distortion at its source, where obsession over what is, right now, cuts you off from any sense of historical perspective. In the case of mass shootings, the exclusion of historical perspective keeps the masses from noticing that mass shootings are a very recent phenomenon and that decades ago, when the United States had vastly more liberal gun laws, and anyone could even purchase fully automatic submachine guns in the mail, this never happened. The question you should ask is, why not? What exactly was different about America 90 years ago compared to today?
The answer to that question is fairly obvious. Modern American society is a factory for psychopaths. The young man in the North American Continent is planted in a field fertilized by atomization, loneliness, and hopelessness. Many have never met their father, and most do not have anything remotely close to a “good relationship” with him. Most have no meaningful connection to the community in which they live, nor even the nation they inhabit. In school, they are social outcasts, driven to niche internet communities for the only semblance of human interaction in their lives. They are marinated in hardcore pornography from before they have even reached pubescence.
They know (or at least perceive) that they will never know the love of a flesh-and-blood woman. They are on the kind of pharmacological cocktail that any premodern society would only ascribe to witchcraft and demon possession. They have nothing to live for and no one who loves them. Given how many young men our nation is producing like this, the question we ought to be asking is not “why does this happen?” but rather “why does it not happen a lot more?”
America is an incredibly sick nation. There is a spiritual sickness that pervades everything like a dark cloud. The people who dominate every institution in our nation have held this power for at least sixty years. For these sixty years, they have treated this nation as a grand social experiment. They have made the natural family, the very bedrock of human civilization, an antiquated, outdated institution that we have progressed beyond.
They have financialized and commodified all of human life, uprooting people from their homes and extended families, and making them mercenaries chasing after a rapidly devalued dollar. They have exported the industry of the nation impoverishing the heartland of the country and leaving them to languish in despair. They actively cheer the deaths and replacement of the hated population, while at the same time denying this was ever their intent. They have introduced racial and ethnic strife, and in the chaos actively undermined rule of law. Sixty years of full-spectrum control by utopian social engineers have transformed the most affluent society in human history into hell on earth.
This did not happen by accident. These people are motivated by a deep hatred of humanity. Like the geriatric that currently occupies the Oval Office who well represents them, they simply do not care how much people suffer. You might think the progressive is merely mistaken, deluded by ideology. This is not the case. They have had more than sixty years to see the full extent of human misery their ideology produces when applied to the healthiest and most prosperous conditions. They know what they are doing.
But what is to be done? The utopian bugmen that dominate our nation must be overcome. You must personally re-capture the same spirit of Christian America that built a great nation. You must do all within your personal sphere of influence to rebuild the things that our enemies have destroyed. You must rebuild churches dominated by liberals and weak-willed conservatives. You must rebuild neighborhoods and communities with people who, like you, love the nation that their great, great-grandparents built and who want to worship the same God who gave them such strength.
You must devote your life to both retaking what institutions you can, and creating alternatives for the institutions you can’t. It is not simply enough to decry that the libs have ruined everything—of course they have, they are like cancer! You must have a vision for your people, you must provide for them the thing they have taken away: hope for the future. We can again have the world that the liberal globalist regime has destroyed. A world where the fear of the Triune God pervades the land and not hopelessness and despair. You can have a world where things like mass shootings never happen again, but you must devote yourself to a life of repentance, faith, and an unquenchable passion for the true, good, and beautiful things God has given.
About The Author
Andrew Isker is the pastor of 4th Street Evangelical Church in Waseca, MN. He is a graduate of Minnesota State University and Greyfriar’s Hall Ministerial Training School, and he has served churches in Missouri, West Virginia, and Minnesota. He is the author of the forthcoming book, The Boniface Option. Andrew, his wife Kara, and their five children reside in his hometown of Waseca, MN. He can be found on Gab @BonifaceOption.
If you enjoyed this email please click here to view it in blog post form and share it with a friend.
Kyle Becker It is an absolute fact that all the runners who participated in the Brooklyn Half Marathon on Saturday declared that they had been vaccinated for Covid-19. Whether or not that is relevant to the unprecedented number of runners who collapsed or even the man who died during the event is another story. […] […]All 16 Runners Who Collapsed and Runner Who Died at Brooklyn Half Marathon Said They Were Vaccinated — The Most Revolutionary Act
On Thursday – just hours after approving another $40 billion in US taxpayer dollars for Ukraine – the US Senate blocked a bipartisan $48 billion aid package for restaurants, gyms, and other small businesses that have been struggling in Biden’s post-lockdown economy. Presumably, they can’t launder that money as easily as shuffling it off to Ukraine, so American business […]America LAST: US Senate REJECTS $48 Billion Aid Package For Small Businesses and Restaurants Just Hours After Approving ANOTHER $40 Billion for Ukraine – 34 RINOs Voted Yes for Ukraine and No for Americans — The Gateway Pundit — Truth2Freedom’s Blog
Durbin: Don’t Take Our Sunshine Away!
By ANH-USAOn 05/10/20220 Comments
reposted here pursuant to Fair Use doctrine
The “sunny” days of Americans being able to regenerate health with vitamin D, the sunshine vitamin, could be over. Action Alert!
Last week, we detailed what we believe to be Sen. Durbin’s end game with regard to his new mandatory product listing bill for dietary supplements: the imposition of European-style restrictions on high-dose vitamins and minerals. For those who care about natural health, one of the most important threats is to high-dose vitamin D. Optimal levels of vitamin D support a breathtaking array of health benefits for brain health, heart health, bone health, immunity, and much more. If we want to preserve our ability to achieve optimal vitamin D levels, we must speak out vehemently against Sen. Durbin’s bill and any attempt to sneak this policy into other unrelated bills.
To recap the issue at hand: Sen. Durbin’s new bill requires supplement companies to register all their products with the FDA, the purpose of which is to allow the FDA to quickly scan the market for products to eliminate. Additionally, “registration” can easily lead to pre-approval, which will cause supplements to cost as much as drugs.
From previous versions of Sen. Durbin’s bill, we know the goal is for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) to develop a list of supplements that can cause “potentially serious” adverse effects. NASEM flags these supplements for the purpose of adding a mandatory warning label, which is a prelude to removing them from the market. Because NASEM has already developed levels above which they believe nutrients can cause adverse events, we believe Sen. Durbin’s list will be used to remove high-dose supplements from the market, including vitamin D.
NASEM’s record on vitamin D is very concerning. This body of “experts” recommends that individuals aged 1-70 get 600 IU (15mcg) of vitamin D per day. NASEM also set the tolerable upper intake level (or UL) for vitamin D—that is, the maximum daily intake unlikely to cause negative effects—at 4,000 IU (100mcg) for those 9 years of age and older.
Integrative health experts will tell you that these levels are simply ridiculous. Those who follow these recommendations will not even come close to being able to take advantage of the therapeutic effects of vitamin D supplementation. Experts on vitamin D have reported that human toxicity begins to occur after chronic daily consumption of about 40,000 IU/day—ten times the upper level established by NASEM.
Further, The Life Extension Foundation conducted an analysis of vitamin D blood tests on supplement users taking between 800 and 2,600 IU a day. They found that 85 percent of these supplement users had insufficient vitamin D (less than 50 ng/mL of 25-hydroxyvitamin D). Some recommend achieving circulating blood levels as high as 80 ng/mL vitamin D. Achieving such levels requires supplementing with about 5,000-8,000 IU vitamin D per day, perhaps even more, depending on the individual. (Achieving the right vitamin D levels is highly dependent on an individual’s biology and should be done in consultation with a healthcare professional because blood levels need to be monitored.)
But as we explained last week, the US is on the road to setting maximum permitted levels of nutrients in supplements as some European countries have been doing. Germany, for example, has set a maximum limit of 20mcg for vitamin D in supplements, which is 800 IU. Italy and France set the maximum level at 50mcg, or 2,000 IU. Sen. Durbin’s bill primes us for similarly draconian restrictions that will hurt our health.
What is especially outrageous about Sen. Durbin’s attack and the NASEM recommendations is that, by the government’s own accounting, 95 percent of Americans are not getting enough vitamin D. These and other nutrient inadequacies are helping to make us sick, but Sen. Durbin and his cronies care more about us buying expensive, dangerous drugs to treat these ailments than with helping us prevent disease with affordable and safe dietary supplements.
We should all care about the potential of vitamin D restrictions. It seems as though with each passing day, more information about the health benefits of vitamin D come to light. Here’s just a sampling of some of the incredible health benefits that will be more difficult to obtain if Senator Durbin gets his way:
- Protecting the Brain. Adequate vitamin D levels are required for normal brain development. It supports the formation of new brain cells and is neuroprotective, helping protect brain cells from premature aging. Higher vitamin D levels are linked with better cognitive function and lower rates of cognitive decline and dementia.
- Cardiovascular Health. Insufficient vitamin D is linked with increased rates of atherosclerosis, heart attack, and overall death due to cardiac causes. Increasing vitamin D intake can help reverse the progression of cardiovascular disease.
- Metabolic Disorders. Diabetes is more prevalent in individuals with low serum vitamin D levels. Vitamin D administration reduces blood sugar, increases sensitivity to insulin, and may decrease the risk of developing full-blown diabetes.
- Immune Enhancement: Noting that influenza epidemics are more common in the winter months, scientists have proposed that low levels of vitamin D may predispose individuals to succumbing to these potentially dangerous respiratory infections. Accordingly, there is also substantial evidence that vitamin D helps with COVID.
- Bone Health. Even government health bureaucrats recognize the importance of vitamin D for bone health. Vitamin D helps maintain adequate calcium levels in the body, which is required for strong bones.
We cannot emphasize this point enough. If European-style standards come to the US, thousands of products would immediately be banned, a project made even easier by Sen. Durbin’s bill. This would be a disaster for public health.
The threat of Durbin’s mandatory FDA registration is urgent. Members of Congress do not understand the problems stemming from this mandate. They are currently considering attaching this proposal to the must-pass Prescription Drug User Fee Act, which means the legislation will be approved by the end of this September, along with any amendments that are attached. This could become law in a matter of a couple months if we don’t ensure that Congress understands why this is such a bad idea. We need to act now to preserve our freedom to stay healthy, naturally.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to oppose Sen. Durbin’s bill and mandatory product listing for dietary supplements. Please send your message immediately.
Rheumatologist: Significant vaccine injuries now reported in 40% of patients, with a 12-fold mortality increase
Tuesday, May 03, 2022 by: Lance D Johnson
Tags: autoimmune diseases, badhealth, badmedicine, Big Pharma, biological weapon, blood clotting, Dangerous Medicine, immune system, neurological conditions, pandemic, pharmaceutical fraud, spike protein, vaccine damage, Vaccine deaths, vaccine injury, vaccines
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Bypass censorship by sharing this link;’
Rheumatologist: Significant vaccine injuries now reported in 40% of patients, with a 12-fold mortality increase
Tuesday, May 03, 2022 by: Lance D Johnson
Tags: autoimmune diseases, badhealth, badmedicine, Big Pharma, biological weapon, blood clotting, Dangerous Medicine, immune system, neurological conditions, pandemic, pharmaceutical fraud, spike protein, vaccine damage, Vaccine deaths, vaccine injury, vaccines
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:
(Natural News) Robert Jackson, a rheumatologist with 35 years of experience, has never seen anything like this in his career. Approximately 40 percent of his fully-vaccinated patients now report significant injuries from the experimental COVID vaccines. Many of the injuries involve newly-diagnosed blood clotting disorders.
Even though the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is capturing record levels of vaccine injuries post COVID vaccination, the numbers do not reflect the shocking 40 percent adverse event rate being reported by Dr. Jackson. This is because vaccine injuries are being normalized. Doctors blindly trust that the vaccines are safe, and they refuse to follow up and report the vaccine injuries that occur in their patients. This is why only one percent of vaccine reactions are reported to VAERS in the first place, according to studies.
Annual mortality jumps 12-fold after Dr. Jackson’s patients take covid vaccines
Dr. Jackson sees about 5,000 patients in a given year. Approximately 3,000 of the patients received at least two doses of a covid-19 mRNA injection. Of these fully vaccinated patients, 40 percent reported a significant vaccine injury or adverse event. Roughly 5 percent of the patients are still suffering a year later from a blood clotting disorder caused by the vaccines.
Throughout his career, Jackson reported around 1 or 2 deaths annually. After his patients got the covid vaccines, there was an unprecedented 12 deaths recorded. The false savior vaccine was neither safe nor effective and is causing a mortality spike that the doctor has never witnessed in his thirty-five-year career! Around 1 in 300 patients were likely killed by the vaccines.
The EULAR database, published in the British Medical Journal, corroborates these findings. In the study there was over 5,000 “fully vaccinated” patients with rheumatic or musculoskeletal diseases; approximately 37 percent of these patients suffered from adverse events post vaccination and 4.4 percent of patients experienced a disease “flare up” after being inoculated. Disingenuously, the study authors concluded that covid-19 vaccine safety profiles are “reassuring” because a “majority of patients tolerated their vaccination well.”
COVID vaccines may cause further damage to people with over-reactive or compromised immune systems
Dr. Jackson is subcontracted across the Midwest and travels to various hospitals to monitor patients. Because he is not employed by a central medical institution, he cannot be forced to take these vaccines or be censored when he speaks up about the rate of vaccine injury in his patients.
Dr. Jackson was able to get a more accurate record of vaccine injuries because he was free to speak about his observations, and he dared to do the follow-up work that many doctors are afraid or too arrogant to do. Dr. Jackson didn’t blindly believe that the vaccines were safe, as was reported incessantly by the media and the CDC. He actually asked his patients what happened after they got the shots.
Rheumatology patients are often referred to as “immune-compromised” because they have over-reactive immune systems. Because of their pre-existing condition, these patients are told they are at greatest risk for COVID complications and therefore must be vaccinated per the CDC orders. However, according to Dr. Jackson’s research, the vaccines are more likely to exacerbate their existing autoimmune condition and cause severe adverse events.
In an Israeli study, patients with an existing autoimmune condition suffered even further after they were given a booster shot. The vaccines can exacerbate a serious condition known as antiphospholipid syndrome. This vaccine-induced syndrome causes blood clotting in patients who already have autoimmune disorders.
In the case series, “Neurological autoimmune diseases following vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2,” researchers found that covid-19 vaccines exacerbate neurological autoimmune conditions. In a Scottish study, covid-19 vaccine induced thrombocytopenic, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. In a German study, covid-19 vaccines caused cerebral venous thrombosis. The evidence is overwhelming: The covid-19 vaccines are causing greater suffering and death.
May 1, 2022
East Declares To Lunatic West: “World Cannot Continue To Live Like This”
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A compelling new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting top Foreign Ministry nuclear war arms negotiator Vladimir Yermakov revealing: “As of today, there’s no use talking about any prospects for negotiations on strategic stability with the United States…This dialogue is formally frozen by the American side”, says he then declared: “A substantive conversation about the prospects of resuming a full-fledged Russian-American negotiation process on the strategic agenda will only return after the implementation of all the tasks of the special military operation in Ukraine”.
As to what the main “task” of “Special De-Nazification Operation” to liberate Ukraine really is, this report notes, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov shocked the Western colonial powers a fortnight ago when he declared: “Russia’s military action in Ukraine is meant to put an end to the US-dominated world order…Our special military operation is also meant to put an end to the unabashed expansion of NATO and the unabashed drive towards full domination by the United States and its Western subjects on the world stage…This domination is built on gross violations of international law and under some rules, which they are now hyping so much and which they make up on a case-by-case basis”.
In the latest response to Russia officially declaring that the main task of this special operation is “to put an end to the US-dominated world order”, this report continues, the American official “newspaper of record” leftist Washington Post, in their just published warning article “Defeating Putin Will Require Larger U.S. Commitments — And Risks”, proclaims: “Mr. Putin’s war aim is not merely to conquer Ukraine but to overthrow the international order itself…It’s worth accepting costs and taking risks to make sure that Russia fails — and emerges from the conflict unable to wage such aggression again”—and is a proclamation in defense of the American-led “international order” coming at the exact same time the United States greatest investor of all time Warren Buffet, who’s known as the “Oracle of Omaha”, viciously slammed Western colonial stock markets with the truthful statement: “The markets have become a gambling parlor…I don’t think we ever had anything quite like we have now in terms of the volumes of pure gambling activity going on daily…It’s not pretty”.
Not being understood by the greater masses of the American people about this present conflict, this report details, is that its true origin began in 1096 when the Western European powers bankrupted their nations to launch their catastrophic religious crusades against the Muslim peoples in the Middle East—were failed religious crusades that split Eastern Orthodox Christians from their Western Christian counterparts—for over 1,000-years it has seen the West trying to exact revenge on Russia because it didn’t support these religious crusades with repeated invasions and confrontations—a fact of history now being remembered in truthful articles like “Clash Of Christianities – Why Europe Cannot Understand Russia”, wherein it observes: “Christianity, once again, is at the heart of a civilizational battle – this time among Christians themselves…Under an ubiquitous, toxic atmosphere of cognitive dissonance drenched in Russophobia, it’s absolutely impossible to have a meaningful discussion on finer points of Russian history and culture across the NATO space…Western Europeans see the Orthodox and Eastern Christians as satraps and a bunch of smugglers, while the Orthodox regard the Western Crusaders as barbarian usurpers bent on world conquest”.
Virtually unknown to the American people, this report notes, is that the global agenda of the Western colonial powers is set yearly at the World Economic Forum in Davos-Switzerland—is a Davos Forum attended by the leaders of the Western colonial powers and their nation’s most elite and wealthiest overlords, all of whom President Putin addressed in person in 2021, where he warned them all that their agendas were destroying the rest of humanity by driving nearly the entire world into abject poverty for the sole benefit of Western elites, saw him warning that the so-called “rules based international order” imposed on the rest of the world by the West was not sustainable because America kept making up its own rules, saw him warning that the American destruction of the world’s religions cultures and other societal norms in order to replace them with evil leftist ideology was about to ignite serious conflicts, and saw him directly telling these Western colonial lunatics:
We are seeing a crisis of the previous models and instruments of economic development. Social stratification is growing stronger both globally and in individual countries.
All this is inevitably affecting the nature of international relations and is not making them more stable or predictable. International institutions are becoming weaker, regional conflicts are emerging one after another, and the system of global security is deteriorating.
The imbalances in global socioeconomic development are a direct result of the policy pursued in the 1980s, which was often vulgar or dogmatic.
This policy rested on the so-called Washington Consensus with its unwritten rules, when the priority was given to the economic growth based on a private debt in conditions of deregulation and low taxes on the wealthy and the corporations.
As you are aware, the inability and unwillingness to find substantive solutions to problems like this in the 20th century led to the World War II catastrophe.
Of course, such a heated global conflict is impossible in principle, I hope. This is what I am pinning my hopes on, because this would be the end of humanity.
However, as I have said, the situation could take an unexpected and uncontrollable turn – unless we do something to prevent this.
There is a chance that we will face a formidable break-down in global development, which will be fraught with a war of all against all and attempts to deal with contradictions through the appointment of internal and external enemies and the destruction of not only traditional values such as the family, which we hold dear in Russia, but fundamental freedoms such as the right of choice and privacy.
I would like to point out the negative demographic consequences of the ongoing social crisis and the crisis of values, which could result in humanity losing entire civilisational and cultural continents.
We have a shared responsibility to prevent this scenario, which looks like a grim dystopia, and to ensure instead that our development takes a different trajectory – positive, harmonious and creative.
Equally unknown to the greater masses of the American people, this report continues, is that Russia is both a formidable power in both the West and East—is a fact important to notice because the East comprises the majority of humanity, and includes the world’s two most populated nations of China and India—in opposition to the Davos Forum that sets the agenda for the Western colonial powers, the East sets its agenda at the Boao Fiorum for Asia and the Raisina Dialogue Forum—and with these two forums setting the agenda for the East having just concluded, the just published article ““Eastern Davos”: This World Is Broken, Bring A New One” reveals:
Two international brainstorming sessions, in China and India, took place one after the other and unexpectedly led to the same conclusions: the world cannot continue to live like this, let’s talk seriously about how to remake it at the root.
The significance of the two forums, of course, is not that there were quite a lot of voices condemning the West. It lies in the fact that powerful and respected platforms are being formed in Asia where one can say out loud and frankly what cannot be said on Western platforms.
Here the question is pertinent: what happened to Davos as such, from where until a few years ago, every year in January, impulses came from what everyone who matters should think about and do?
The first and simplest answer is that Davos has fallen into his own global trap.
We’re talking about the virus, of course.
Everyone remembers and no one will forget that it was the chief conductor of Davos, Klaus Schwab, who came up in 2020 with his famous idea of a “covid reset” of the whole world, with total lockdowns, an unprecedented defeat of human societies and the economy: the world must be broken and rebuilt.
With Belgorod Region Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov reporting this morning: “A fire has occurred on the territory of one of the sites belonging to the Defense Ministry”, this report concludes, the fire at this Russia military site near the border with Ukraine now joins the latest urgent war bulletins issued by the Ministry of Defense (MoD), the most notable of which are:
“Over the past 24 hours, Russian missile and artillery troops struck 319 areas of the amassment of enemy manpower and military equipment, 12 command posts and two missile/artillery arms and ammunition depots”.
“Over the past 24 hours, operational-tactical aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces struck two command posts, nine company-level strongholds and areas of amassed manpower and military equipment as well as five ammunition and fuel depots…More than 200 nationalists and 23 pieces of armored vehicles have been eliminated”.
“On 30 April, 46 civilians came out of residential buildings located near the besieged Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol…The first group of 25 civilians left on Saturday afternoon, while the second group of 21 people came out in the evening”.
“Overall, the following Ukraine targets have been eliminated by Russian military forces since the start of the special military operation: 2,678 tanks and other combat armored vehicles and 2,503 special military motor vehicles…In addition, 143 aircraft, 112 helicopters, 660 unmanned aerial vehicles, 279 surface-to-air missile systems, 308 multiple launch rocket systems and 1,196 field artillery guns and mortars had been taken out”.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
President Biden will deliver remarks this morning to explain why US taxpayers need to send another $33 billion of “aid” to Ukraine to “Support Ukrainians Defending Their Country and Their Freedom Against Russia’s Brutal War.” As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal – which the officials said was expected to last for five months – has more […]Watch Live: President Biden Explains Why Ukraine Needs Another $33 Billion Of US Taxpayer Money | ZeroHedge News — Truth2Freedom’s Blog
WASHINGTON, D.C.—The Department of Homeland Security has formed the Disinformation Governance Board to bravely combat incorrect opinions on the internet. According to sources, the board’s Executive Director Nina Jankowicz has appointed Hunter Biden to sit on the board for a salary of $50,000 per month. “We are proud to welcome Hunter to our Ministry of Tr– […]Hunter Biden To Receive $50K Per Month Salary For Seat On Disinformation Governance Board — The Babylon Bee — Truth2Freedom’s Blog
https://hotair.com//jazz-shaw/2022/04/29/mayorkas-looks-to-divert-va-funding-to-illegal-immigrants-n465790?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=8929db9d936e3d3e93c9f3cca6e5d0c00c9a594a0309c9dc58444f601fd6b923Mayorkas looks to divert VA funding to illegal immigrants … — Freedom Is Just Another Word…
I don’t know how widespread “Nextdoor” is. A few years ago, I got an invitation by mail (said it was from one of my neighbors), inviting me to join a community forum type thing online, called Nextdoor. It showed that there was a group of people that live on ____ Rd, and it was Nextdoor, _____Rd. So, I joined.
It seemed ok, and I could find out things going on in the neighborhood, without having to gossip with anyone, or feel like a busybody. I guess it is similar to facebook or something, but is for the area in which one lives. So every now and again I go there and read some of what is going on in the neighborhood. The rules didn’t seem too strict, and I never really worried about what my comments were. I don’t discriminate against others, no matter how different they are from the…
View original post 848 more words
World’s Largest English Language News Service with Over 500 Articles Updated Daily
“The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow.”
Note: This is an urgent private letter intended for the sole and exclusive use of the patron/donors to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.
24 March 2022
Whoever Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities
While the Western media continues its non-stop war propaganda over the Russian invasion of Ukraine, I found it more than interesting that the top story ricocheting around the rest of the world yesterday, most particularly in Africa and the Middle East, involved United States Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, whose gobsmacking exchange with US Senator Marsha Blackburn that stunned every normal and sane person around the globe was:
Senator Blackburn: Can you provide a definition for the word, “woman”?
Judge Jackson: Can I provide a definition? No.
Senator Blackburn: Yeah?.
Judge Jackson: I can’t.
Senator Blackburn: You can’t?
Judge Jackson: Not in this context. I’m not a biologist.
Leaving aside the absurdity of how Judge Jackson could actually be the first black “woman” to be nominated to the Supreme Court, as she clearly doesn’t even know if she is a “woman”, I have no doubt that she’s fully supported by every one of those who obediently followed the socialist edicts to inject themselves with dangerous and unproven Covid vaccines, about whom a survey conducted by polling firm EKOS shows that Canadians who received “three or more doses” of a Covid-19 vaccine tended to express significantly more support for aggressive anti-Russian measures with regard to the ongoing military conflict in Ukraine—and I also have no doubt that Judge Jackson is fully supported by elite New York City socialite Lauren Pazienza, who yesterday was arrested and charged with manslaughter for pushing an elderly 87-year-old woman to her death, after this shocking crime she hid out at her wealthy parents’ home and deleted all of her social media pages, saw classmates describing her as bully from her earliest school days, and, or course, her Democrat Party privileged parents quickly posted her $1-million bail.
Now if you’ve ever wondered exactly why the Western socialist forces have declared an all-out war on history and logical thought, everything I’ve just related to you is a prime example of why—specifically because there was a time when educated people were able to connect-the-dots between such things like Judge Jackson not knowing what a “woman” is, the blind war lust of the Covid vaccinated obedient masses, and elite socialists brutally murdering the elderly—the first one coming to mind being the 18th Century French philosopher-historian Voltaire, who famously [this is the most exact French to English translation] warned:
Truly, whoever can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
If the God-given understanding of your mind does not resist a demand to believe what is impossible, then you will not resist a demand to do wrong to that God-given sense of justice in your heart.
Among the most vile and demonic believers in socialist absurdities committing human atrocities was former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who died yesterday at the age of 84, after which Nazi German supporter socialist-globalist architect George Soros proclaimed: “Madeleine Albright was an astute stateswoman, scholar, and a true champion for freedom and democracy”—most honestly it saw former Macedonian diplomat Risto Nikovski stating: “The foreign policy that Albright pursued together with Bill Clinton led to the encircling of Russia from all sides by new NATO members…That encirclement is de facto the reason for all the problems that started in Ukraine and will continue in Europe in the future as well as in the world”—but whose true and lasting legacy known to every man, woman and school child in the entire Eastern world, was evidenced in her 1996 interview on 60 Minutes, wherein it was revealed:
Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it.
Also believing in socialist absurdities and thinking nothing about committing human atrocities is former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who after the President George W. Bush administration, in 2003, convinced Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi to dismantle his nuclear weapons programme, saw her, in 2011, ordering the complete NATO bombing destruction of Libya and the murdering of Qaddafi—shortly after which Clinton gave an interview where she gleefully exclaimed while laughing: “We came, we saw, he died!”—a demonic display joined by Libya becoming the largest refugee crisis in modern times—today sees the United Nations reporting: “An estimated 1.3 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance in Libya. Hundreds of thousands of people across the country are suffering. They are living in unsafe conditions with little or no access to health care, essential medicines, food, safe drinking water, shelter or education”—and after watching what happened to Libya, it saw North Korea breaking off talks with US and expanding its nuclear weapons programme.
Striking back against these socialist absurdities that allowed the death of 500,000 children in Iraq and plunged Libya into total chaos and abject misery, this week it saw Syrian President Bashar al-Assad accusing these Western elites of hypocrisy and moral decadence in their dealings with the peoples of the world—then it saw Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin rebuking the United States as “the biggest human rights violator in the world”.
All of this is critical for you to know, specifically because as people in the Western world are daily assaulted with non-stop socialist Russia-Ukraine war propaganda, the people in the Eastern world are intently focused on the United States controlling about 750 bases in at least 80 countries worldwide and its spending more on its military than the next 10 countries combined—and whose reason for this intense focus is documented by the Brown University findings contained in their “Costs Of War Project”, that reveals: “Over 929,000 people have died in the post-9/11 wars due to direct war violence, and several times as many due to the reverberating effects of war…Over 387,000 civilians have been killed as a result of the fighting…38 million is the number of war refugees and displaced persons…The US federal price tag for the post-9/11 wars is over $8 trillion…The US government is conducting counterterror activities in 85 countries…The wars have been accompanied by violations of human rights and civil liberties, in the U.S. and abroad”.
Whatever your views may be about the barely month old Russia-Ukraine conflict, it pales into insignificance when measured against the massive wholesale destruction the United States has caused around the world these past two decades—and whose reason this is allowed to happen was previously, in 2014, documented by the Washington Post in their article “Americans Read Headlines. And Not Much Else”, wherein it revealed: “Roughly six in 10 people acknowledge that they have done nothing more than read news headlines…And, in truth, that number is almost certainly higher than that, since plenty of people won’t want to admit to just being headline-gazers but, in fact, are”.
Adding to this dangerous practice of Americans reading only headlines for their news, and as I alerted you about in my August-2021 Letter, the article “Biden Is Betting Americans Will Forget About Afghanistan”, further revealed: “People in and around the White House are relying on Americans’ notoriously short-term memory…The White House’s dream scenario is that in the end, the voters don’t blame Joe Biden for anything that happens in Afghanistan”.
As a direct consequence of this dangerous practice of just reading news headlines and their notorious short-term memories, these Americans today are accepting as fact such things like the just published New York Post article “NATO: 7,000 to 15,000 Russian Troops Dead On Ukraine”, whose headline appears to claim that these are deaths reported by NATO, sees this claim now being widely reported throughout the Western media—but when reading down into the depths of this article sees it stating: “A senior NATO military official said the alliance’s estimate was based on information from Ukrainian authorities” and revealing: “Ukraine has released little information about its own military losses, and the West has not given an estimate, but President Volodymr Zelensky said nearly two weeks ago that about 1,300 Ukrainian servicemen had been killed”.
For anyone who wants to believe the Ukrainian “authorities” who claim they’ve killed up to 15,000 highly-trained and experienced Russian combat soldiers belonging to the world’s second-largest army, while only suffering about 1,300 losses of their own, I’d first respectfully refer them to world renowned American tactical war strategist retired US Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor, Ph.D., who this week honestly declared: “The war is really over for the Ukrainian…They have been grounded to bits”—then I’d respectfully remind them that these are the exact same Ukrainian “authorities” that released video game footage and falsely claimed it showed them shooting down Russia jets—falsely claimed Russia killed defiant Ukraine soldiers on Snake Island, but all of whom are alive—falsely claimed that a large number of Russian servicemen refused to participate in the special operation on the territory of Ukraine, but whose documents they used as evidence were all fakes and not even used by the Russian military—this week they put out a video where Ukrainian demolition experts managed to defuse a high-explosive FAB-250 aerial bomb literally with their bare hands, unscrewing the fuse and watering it, but is laughably fake because this type of bomb is paper thin and even if it didn’t explode, would have shattered into thousands of pieces on impact—this week they put out a video of Ukrainian soldiers capturing a Russian BRDM amphibious armored scout car, another laughable fake because Russia hasn’t used these outdated BRDM’s for over a decade, and the one in the video has “pixel” camouflage used by Ukraine—and this week saw them outrageously claiming that Russia is ready to use chemical weapons in Ukraine, that if factual reality is an impossibility because Russia doesn’t have any chemical weapons, as verified by United Nations chemical treaty weapons inspectors in 2017.
Though truthful sites like WarOnFakes keep hourly track and expose with facts, provable evidence and documentation all of the lies being spread about the Russia-Ukraine conflict, I’m sure none of you would be surprised to learn that the leftist fake news war propagandist are winning out among the “notoriously short-term” Americans that rely only on “headlines” for their news.
But that doesn’t mean those very few us left that are still telling the truth should just give up, rather it makes what we do even more critical in times like these—most importantly because nothing less than World War III is at stake.
For over 20-years, the Dear Sisters have informed and educated you about everything underlying this global conflict—and yesterday, Sister Ciara’s letter “Sooner Or Later The Endless Spectacle Is Over. Then We Will Take Revenge; Mercilessly.”, explained and documented how truly existential this conflict is to the entire world, and that she began with the John Michael Crichton quote: “If you don’t know history, then you don’t know anything…You are a leaf that doesn’t know it is part of a tree”.
Today, right now in fact, this “tree of truth” that you’re a “leaf” of desperately needs your kind and generous support by you going below and giving what you can—and by doing, you protect us all from living under those who believe absurdities to the point it allows them to commit atrocities.
Thank you for listening and aiding us in our hour of desperate need by going below and giving what you can, and as always, please feel free to write me at email@example.com with any comments/questions/suggestions, remembering to put ATTN: BRIAN in the subject line, or if requesting to be placed on the Sisters mailing list, put MAILING LIST in the subject line.
All the best folks,
Take a good look at this photo it doesn’t take CSI expertise to notice. Bottom line is their deception skills are really getting bad! See the first few rolls, the seating scheme of separation. They’ll tell you it is social distancing. It may be………..for the cameras! Then look further back where people are setting side […]MIXED SEATING, DECEPTION SKILLS GETTING REALLY BAD! — ARLIN REPORT……………….walking this path together
TREASON: Biden admin gave China wealth of intelligence on Russia prior to invasion; Beijing gave it to Moscow
Tuesday, March 01, 2022 by: JD Heyes
Tags: amateurs, Biden regime, big government, China, conspiracy, deception, intelligence, invasion, Russia, Russian invasion, stupid, traitors, treason, U.S. intelligence, Ukraine, War, White House
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:<a href="http://<a href="https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-01-biden-admin-gave-china-intelligence-on-russia.html">TREASON: Biden admin gave China wealth of intelligence on Russia prior to invasion; Beijing gave it to Moscow</a>" data-type="URL" data-id="<a href="https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-01-biden-admin-gave-china-intelligence-on-russia.html">TREASON: Biden admin gave China wealth of intelligence on Russia prior to invasion; Beijing gave it to Moscow<a href=”https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-01-biden-admin-gave-china-intelligence-on-russia.html”>TREASON: Biden admin gave China wealth of intelligence on Russia prior to invasion; Beijing gave it to Moscow</a>
(Natural News) The last time such a brazen act of treason was committed against America, actress Jane Fonda traveled to North Vietnam and was photographed sitting at an anti-aircraft gun wearing a helmet, in a massive propaganda victory for Hanoi.
Literally, Jane Fonda provided “aid and comfort” to an enemy while American troops were fighting and dying there.
Now, it seems, her act of harming the United States has nearly been equaled by the rank amateurs running the Biden regime, according to a report last week by The New York Times, of all papers.
In the months during Russia’s buildup of forces along the boundaries of Ukraine, the Biden administration was feeding that intelligence to China — and China, in turn, turned it over to Russia (because neither country is our friend):
“Over three months, senior Biden administration officials held half a dozen urgent meetings with top Chinese officials in which the Americans presented intelligence showing Russia’s troop buildup around Ukraine and beseeched the Chinese to tell Russia not to invade,” the Times reported.
“Each time, the Chinese officials, including the foreign minister and the ambassador to the United States, rebuffed the Americans, saying they did not think an invasion was in the works. After one diplomatic exchange in December, U.S. officials got intelligence showing Beijing had shared the information with Moscow, telling the Russians that the United States was trying to sow discord — and that China would not try to impede Russian plans and actions,” the paper continued.
The report came just after tens of thousands of Russian troops stormed into Ukraine in a long-expected invasion and fighting had already reached the outskirts of the capital of Kyiv and the country’s second-largest city, Kharkiv.
The paper also reported that the meetings during which Biden regime officials gave U.S. intelligence to China came after a video summit between Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping in mid-November.
The Times noted further:
After the meeting, American officials decided that the Russian troop buildup around Ukraine presented the most immediate problem that China and the United States could try to defuse together. Some officials thought the outcome of the video summit indicated there was potential for an improvement in U.S.-China relations.
Others were more skeptical, but thought it was important to leave no stone unturned in efforts to prevent Russia from attacking, one official said.
A few days later, Biden regime officials met with China’s U.S. ambassador, Qin Gang, at the Chinese embassy, during which they told him what American intelligence agencies had discovered: That Russian forces had ringed Ukraine, and that armored units were among them.
CIA Director William Burns previously flew to Moscow on Nov. 2 to present the same information to his Russian counterparts, the Times reported, adding that U.S. intelligence officials shared the same information in mid-November with NATO.
In addition to providing Beijing with all of the Russian troop buildup intelligence, Biden regime amateurs also told Chinese officials what specific sanctions the U.S. was preparing to impose on Russia if Putin invaded, and how they could also negatively impact China because of the country’s close ties with Russia. Regime amateurs also tried to ‘convince’ China — whom nearly every nation trades with and depends on for a raft of commodities — that its reputation would suffer in a Russian invasion — as if Xi is worried about that.
But of course, the increasingly desperate attempts “went nowhere,” the Times reported, with China’s Qin reportedly acting “skeptical and suspicious.”
And why wouldn’t he? China is not our friend; surely Qin thought that the regime amateurs were simply trying to feed him disinformation in an attempt to splinter the Russia-China relationship.
This blatant act of treason will go unpunished, though, because our governmental institutions have become so politicized they simply no longer function as designed.
RECEIVE OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER
Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.
More news on amateurs
Take Action: Support Natural News by linking to this article from your website
Permalink to this article:
Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):
Reprinting this article:
Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.
Dr. Li-Meng Yan says CCP is spreading hemorrhagic fever bioweapon at Olympics, reveals antidote
Tuesday, February 15, 2022 by: Ethan Huff
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:
(Natural News) J.D. Rucker recently interviewed the illustrious Dr. Li-Meng Yan, who told him that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has released a lab-manufactured hemorrhagic fever bioweapon at the Winter Olympics in Beijing.
“Before I get into the details,” Rucker writes, “it’s important to understand that she and her sources are highly credible. There have been concerted efforts to discredit her, but her claims as far back as early 2020 have invariably been proven accurate.”
Li-Meng was one of the first, if you recall, to come forward with evidence suggesting that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed in a Chinese laboratory. The powers that be tried to discredit her, but her claims continue to stand the test of time.
“They tried to disprove what she’s said all along, that Peter Daszak and Anthony Fauci had intimate knowledge of the gain-of-function research that was going on in Wuhan,” Rucker adds.
“They even tried to prove she was wrong about the inefficacy of the vaccines. All of her claims have been verified and she has been vindicated multiple times.”
Get ready for a second round of the plandemic, bleeding orifices style
Li-Meng told Rucker that the CCP has been studying various “strains,” if you will, of hemorrhagic fever viruses. These include Lassa, Marburg, and hantavirus, all of which just so happen to share the same CD38 drug target in the disease.
Her sources reveal that the CDC was already fully prepared to release this bioweapon during the Winter Olympics, though she cannot confirm which strain of the virus has been released without first obtaining the viral genome.
This new bioweapon is supposedly much more deadly than the Fauci Flu, which may have just been a test run for the final act, so to speak, in the current world order.
According to UPI, health authorities in the United Kingdom have already identified at least two cases of viral hemorrhagic fever, and possibly a third. If confirmed, these mark the first time the illness has been seen in the country in over a decade.
Officials claim that the cases of Lassa fever, as they have classified it, are from the same family and are linked to recent travel to western Africa, where the illness is said to be endemic.
“Two of the cases are conclusive and the third hasn’t been confirmed yet,” reports reveal. “Lassa fever is an acute viral hemorrhagic illness and infection usually occurs through food or household items contaminated with urine or feces from rats who are carrying the virus.”
In milder cases, Lassa fever causes a fever, obviously, and fatigue. In more severe cases, it can result in bleeding of the mouth, breathing difficulties, and low blood pressure.
“Most people who contract Lassa fever don’t develop any symptoms and it’s fatal in only about 1% of cases,” UPI further reported. “The new cases are the first in Britain since 2009.”
Bleeding orifices are a common occurrence with severe cases of hemorrhagic fever, assuming this is really what was released at the Olympics. Since the media is already blaming a scapegoat, rats from Africa, the world could see another round of the plandemic.
“The problem with this report is that the disease may not be standard Lassa fever, but possibly something new that was created through gain-of-function research,” Rucker notes.
“Dr. Yan has not confirmed this, but based on sources and evidence, Lassa is one of the bioweapons they prepared to launch attacks during or after Winter Olympics … She noted that CCP military scientists worked with Liberia to study Ebola in 2014. They also sent six groups of scientists to Sierra Leone to study Lassa viruses, most recently in 2020.”
Li-Meng says that a simple cure for hemorrhagic fever is a drug by Johnson & Johnson (J&J) called Darzalex (daratumumab), which is approved to treat multiple myeloma.
The latest news about communist China can be found at Terrorism.news.
February 14, 2022
Plot To Destroy Trump Confirms: “Waiting For Death Is Often Harder Than Dying”
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A foreboding new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting President Putin summoned his top ministers to an urgent war meeting this morning, says preceding this announcement it saw top Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stating: “A recorded refusal by Ukraine, a confirmed rejection of the idea of Ukraine joining NATO, is a step that would contribute significantly to the formulation of a more meaningful response to Russian concerns”—a statement following Ukrainian Ambassador Vadim Prystaiko telling the BBC during an interview that Ukraine might “contemplate not joining NATO” to avoid a war—quickly after which Ukrainian presidential spokesman Sergey Nikiforov said his ambassador’s words were “taken out of context”, and declared for clarification: “Ukraine’s aspirations for NATO and the EU are enshrined in the country’s constitution”—a declaration joined by Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba revealing that disconnecting Russia from the global payment system SWIFT had been removed from the sanctions options should Ukraine be invaded, with him stating: “Let’s be clear, if this package included SWIFT, it would be an atomic bomb…But even without SWIFT in it, this package remains a very powerful bomb of economic pressure on Russia”—a revelation immediately responded to by top Russian Ambassador Viktor Tatarintsev, who plainly stated: “Excuse my language, but we don’t give a shit about sanctions…The expansion of NATO is the biggest threat to Russia”.
To further ignite war hysteria, this report notes, yesterday the socialist Biden Regime screamed: “Russia could invade Ukraine at any time and might create a surprise pretext for an attack”—a warmongering scream of hysteria quickly joined by top Biden Regime official National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan raving: “If there is a military invasion of Ukraine by Russia, it’s likely to begin with a significant barrage of missiles and bomb attacks”.
In quick response to this lunatic warmongering hysteria, this report details, all flights into and out of Ukraine were grounded after global insurance companies said they would no longer insure planes flying in their airspace—an abrupt halt to air travel not affecting Ukraine’s richest oligarchs, all of whom have fled and/or are fleeing in their private planes—yesterday it then saw Ukraine requesting a meeting of members of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), and stating: “Russia failed to respond to our request under the Vienna Document. Consequently, we take the next step…We request a meeting with Russia and all participating states within 48 hours to discuss its reinforcement and redeployment along our border and in temporarily occupied Crimea”—in factual reality Crimea is the sovereign territory of the Russian Federation it will defend with all-out war—a fact of war that caused some OCSE member countries to pull their observers out of Ukraine—that was swiftly followed by the OCSE announcing: “The Special Monitoring Mission will continue to implement its approved mandate with its monitors deployed in ten cities throughout Ukraine”—are OSCE monitors whose mandate sees them recording cease fire violations in the disputed eastern regions of Ukraine—and because he knows the truth that these cease fire violations are nearly all caused by his own troops, is why yesterday, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky called and urged Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden to come to his country to “stop the spread of panic”, and directly pled: “I am convinced that your visit to Kyiv in the coming days would be a powerful signal and help stabilize the situation”.
In rare and honest reporting, this report continues, some Western news outlets are awakening to the fact that Germany doesn’t believe any of this fake news Russian invasion of Ukraine nonsense—and even more surprisingly, the American leftist MSN media outlet just published the honest article “If Russia Is On The Brink Of Invading Ukraine, You Wouldn’t Know It In Moscow”, wherein it factually states: “To most Russians the risk of war with Ukraine is as far-fetched as the chance of getting hit by a chunk of melting snow…Moscow’s outdoor skating rinks are full, a major exhibition of an iconic 20th century artist is pre-booked for a month and high street retailers are vying to lure in customers for a Valentine’s Day shopping spree…And as Russia’s long and brutal winter draws slowly to a close, Moscow’s utility workers are clambering onto rooftops across the city to shovel off melting snow, warning passers-by to avoid falling ice as it lands with a thud on the pavement”.
As to why Russian peoples view “the risk of war with Ukraine is as far-fetched as the chance of getting hit by a chunk of melting snow”, this report explains, is because they know the truth that this entire crisis is part of the plot to destroy President Donald Trump—a plot masterminded by those like socialist top Obama-Biden Regime official Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, whom CNN quoted as saying: “The new doctrine is the potential for using intelligence as a weapon of information operations”—in this “information operation” plot to take down President Trump saw it beginning during the height of the 2016 Presidential Election when, on 27 July 2016, leftist fake news war propaganda articles began in appearing in Europe like “The Russians Are Crawling. Is Ukraine Ready For An Open War With Russia?”, wherein it was comically claimed Russia had massed up 100,000 troops to invade Ukraine—fake news igniting a cause célèbre (a controversial issue that attracts a great deal of public attention) over poor little Ukraine set upon by the evil Russian monster whom President Trump wouldn’t defend, and led to his sham impeachment—a plot further revealed about this past Friday when Special Counsel John Durham filed in US Federal Court the bombshell document “US v. Sussmann – GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO INQUIRE INTO POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST”, wherein it beyond shockingly reveals that Hillary Clinton paid operatives infiltrated Trump Tower and the White House to plant false evidence linking President Trump to Russia—a bombshell revelation that today is under a complete and total media blackout by every single leftist American news outlet—is a criminal conspiracy plot President Trump most correctly assessed yesterday is “Bigger than Watergate”—a fact known to those like famed Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo, who during a 2020 interview with top Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, it saw Jarrett refusing to answer if President Obama directed the criminal spying on President Trump—and is critical to note because yesterday, it saw Bartiromo joining the Russian peoples to truthfully tell all Americans that “The Ukraine war is ruse to distract them from Hillary Clinton’s crimes against President Trump”.
Due to the socialist Biden Regime and its leftist media lapdogs whipping up war hysteria to conceal the criminal plot against President Trump, this report concludes, it has caused the peoples of Ukraine to know the truth that “waiting for death is often harder than dying”—in America sees its peoples being fed war propaganda like the 29 January screed “Russia Moves Blood Supplies Near Ukraine, Adding to U.S. Concern”, but none of them being told the truth that blood for transfusions to those wounded has a shelf life of 30-days, and is best used in 15-days—on 31 January saw them being fed war propaganda claiming that Russia will invade Ukraine in February because the ground will be frozen enough for tanks to roll over, but none of them being told the truth that the air temperature since 10 February in Kharkov, Kiev and Debaltseve is from 2 Celsius (35.6 Fahrenheit ) to 6 Celsius (42.8 Fahrenheit ) degrees, in Odessa, where a major landing operation was predicted, it is from 7 Celsius (44.6 Fahrenheit) to 10 Celsius (50 Fahrenheit) degrees above zero, and the same forecast through the beginning of March is the same—sees them not being told such provable facts like: “During the fighting in Donbass 2014–15, “Rebels” on other days spent a carload of ammunition per day…The total consumption of materiel during the offensive of the regiment with the use of conventional weapons will be 400 tons per day…It is clear that for the armada they need many times more…And this is not yet visible”—sees none of them logically questioning that if Russia was going to invade Ukraine where has it massed the hundreds of thousands of tons of fuel and supplies such an undertaking would need, and whose evidence of would clog every road and railroad in the country for months—and most critically not being spoken about is if Russian was really planning an invasion, it then make sense if Ukraine deployed their military forces to stop them, which it hasn’t, and is why honest observers are saying such things today like: “The complete absence of even signs of a set of measures of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in response to the imminent Russian offensive, which is three days away, is an irrefutable fact!”. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]https://www.youtube.com/embed/0b97n-PcBWg
Where is all the violence, mayhem and looting?? Oh wait, that would be the Left and it’s punks. So … Why are we not seeing Anti-Fa and BLM protesting and attacking the Truckers? Just asking… Now that would be an ass kicking worth watching….Truckers stomping a few asshats …About Those Trucker Convoys/Protests .. — Freedom Is Just Another Word…
February 1, 2022
Fate Of Soros Controlled America Rests On “Big Orange Cat” Underdog History
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
An intriguing new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting top Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov not ruling out that President Putin will express his reaction to Washington’s responses to Russia’s security proposals later this afternoon after his meeting with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, says Peskov then revealed that President Putin’s scheduled teleconference with Prime Minister Boris Johnson didn’t take place because the British leader was otherwise occupied trying to stay in power because of his “Partygate” scandal—a revelation followed by leaked texts showing that a top colleague of Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison labeled him a “complete psycho” and the socialist Biden Regime putting pressure on Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro to call off his visit to Moscow in February—then quick to join this Western clown show lunacy was the Biden Regime ordering the families of American diplomats to leave Belarus this morning.
Security Council Members in this transcript note the Biden Regime comically claiming that its order to evacuate the families of American diplomats is because of “unusual” Russian military activity in Belarus, but in factual reality is not even in the slightest “unusual”, as Russian and Belarus military forces have trained together for the past 5-years in Belarus since they began their yearly Zapad Exercise in 2017, none of which caused the Americans to react as hysterically as they’re now doing.
In another act of deranged socialist lunacy, this report notes, yesterday it saw the Biden Regime hijacking an ordinary United Nations Security Council meeting discussing issues related to Libya to pump up more war hysteria—a hijacking coming on the last day of NATO-member Norway’s rotating presidency of the UN Security Council, before Russia takes over today for the month of February—and in response to saw Russian Permanent United Nations Representative Vassily Nebenzia factually stating: “In its explanatory note to the initiative to call today’s meeting, the US delegation said it considers the deployment of Russian troops on Russian territory as a threat to international peace…It is not only inadmissible interference into the domestic affairs of our country but also an attempt to mislead the international community about the real situation in the region and the reasons for the current global tensions…As a matter of fact, they suggest we call a Security Council meeting over wild guesses and ungrounded accusations that we have repeatedly refuted…Apart from that, the open format suggested by the United States, along with the extremely provocative topic, makes this meeting a classical example of megaphone diplomacy, playing to the gallery”.
When previously “playing to the gallery” at the United Nations, this report continues, it saw radical socialist American Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield proclaiming to the world that the United States is a vile racist nation, and who declared: “I have seen for myself how the original sin of slavery weaved white supremacy into our founding documents and principles”—after hijacking yesterday’s meeting then it saw Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield hysterically proclaiming: “The situation we are facing in Europe is urgent and dangerous…Russia’s actions strike at the very heart of the U.N. charter”—in quick reply it saw Ambassador Nebenzia reminding the world that the United States had been behind the 2014 change of government in Ukraine that had driven a pro-Moscow leadership from power and then installed into power “nationalists, radicals, Russophobes and pure Nazis”—saw Ambassador Nebenzia further reminding the world that the United States lied the United Nations into war by falsely claiming Iraq had weapons of mass destruction—after which Ambassador Nebenzia factually stated: “Our Western partners talk about the need for de-escalation, but first of all themselves ramp up tension with their rhetoric and provoke an escalation…Talk about an impending war is provocative in itself,…Where did the figure of a hundred thousand military personnel come from, which, as you say, are located on the Russian-Ukrainian border, although this is not true?…It looks like you’re calling for this, wanting and waiting for it to happen…As if you want to make your allegations a reality…It seems that our American colleagues are ready to sacrifice Ukraine to their geopolitical interests”.
Now added to this socialist Biden Regime lunacy, this report notes, was the leftist Washington Post reporting this morning: “The Russian government has delivered a written response to a U.S. proposal aimed at de-escalating the Ukraine crisis, said a U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic talks”—a blatant lie quickly responded to by Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko, who factually declared: “This report is not true”.
While discussing these grave issues, this transcript sees Security Council Members noting that as the threat of socialist Nazism spread throughout Europe in the 1930s, it caused American leader President Franklin Roosevelt to presciently observe: “In history, nothing happens by accident…If it happened, you can bet someone planned it”—a prescient observation critically needed to be remembered by sane and normal Americans, specifically because yesterday it saw ABC Network news host Whoopi Goldberg declaring that the Holocaust was not about race because it involved two groups of white peoples, despite the systematic killing by the Nazis of an estimated six million Jews.
With even the United States government officially stating: “Race categories generally reflect social definitions in the U.S. and are not an attempt to define race biologically, anthropologically, or genetically…We recognize that the race categories include racial and national origins and sociocultural groups”, this report details, the beyond shocking claim that Jewish peoples are not a race conforms to the Nazi ideology that branded anyone not supporting their despotic socialist regime as diseased vermin rats needing to be exterminated—a branding that horrifyingly reemerged into the world on 18 December 2020 when the leftist Washington Post published their full page article “All The Republican Rats” depicting Republican Party leaders as vermin rats, and stated over these vermin rat caricatures: “All of the state attorneys general and U.S. Congress members who collaborated with President Trump in his attempt to subvert the Constitution and stay in office”—saw these Republican Party leaders branded as vermin rats two days after 16 December 2020, the date President Donald Trump issued the top secret order “Presidential Findings To Preserve Collect And Analyze National Security Information Regarding The 2020 General Election” directing the Pentagon to seize and examine the voting machines involved in the 2020 election—but while this examination was ongoing at the secret spy hub in Nashville-Tennessee, it was obliterated in a massive bomb blast on 25 December 2020.
In adhering to President Roosevelt’s wise advice to uncover the “someone” planning these things that “don’t happen by accident”, this report continues, the main road of discovery leads to socialist Biden Regime top diplomat warmonger United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken, whose centuries-old Hungarian-Ukraine family ties link directly to the most dangerous socialist-globalist demon in the world George Soros, and is why Soros’ Open Society Archives, based in the Hungarian capital of Budapest, was renamed the Blinken Open Society Archives in 2015.
Born as György Schwartz on 12 August 1930 in Hungary, this report details, the true history of the now renamed George Soros beyond shockingly reveals: “When Hitler’s henchman Adolf Eichmann arrived in Hungary, to oversee the murder of that country’s Jews, George Soros ended up with a man whose job was confiscating property from the Jewish population…Soros went with him on his rounds…George Soros called 1944 “The Best Year of his Life”…70% of Soros’s fellow Jews in Hungary, nearly a half-million human beings, were annihilated in that year”—a true history George Soros demonically celebrated during a 1998 interview with 60 Minutes journalist Steve Kroft, wherein one exchange between them horrifyingly reveals:
KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.
SOROS: Yes. Yes.
KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from your fellow Jews, friends and neighbors.
SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.
KROFT: I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many, years. Was it difficult?
SOROS: No, not at all. Not at all, I rather enjoyed it.
KROFT: No feelings of guilt?
SOROS: No, none at all.
Security Council Members in this transcript note that the demonic power George Soros wields in America is beyond staggering—as best exampled yesterday when after Soros called for the Chinese government to be overthrown it was quickly joined by FBI Director Christopher Wray declaring that the threat from China is more brazen than ever before—is further exampled by noticing that after Soros funded and installed into power the “legal arsonist” district attorneys exploding crime throughout America it was met by the United States Department of Justice doling out millions-of-dollars to the charities linked to these Soros district attorneys—and this past week it saw Soros pumping $125-million into a socialist Democrat Party super PAC to use in trying to steal the upcoming 2022 midterm election.
In knowing the grave danger George Soros poses to the United States and its under socialist siege citizens, this report concludes, America’s most watched and trusted newsman Tucker Carlson of Fox News is releasing tomorrow his powerful warning documentary “Hungary vs. Soros: The Fight For Civilization”—a warning about Soros this transcript sees Chairwoman Valentina Matviyenko noting is desperately needed, but who then says it’s equally important to notice the just published Wall Street Journal article “I Can’t Believe It, But The Cincinnati Bengals Are In The Super Bowl” as it pertains to the fate of America—an article wherein it states: “America’s underdog turns out to be a Big Orange Cat”, but whose significance lies in this Cincinnati Bengals football team having last appeared in the Super Bowl during the 1981 and 1988 seasons—a 1981 year that saw President Ronald Reagan coming to power and a 1988 year that saw Mikhail Gorbachev gaining full control over the Soviet Union, both of whom joined together during this time span to improbably and unexpectedly end the Cold War—with this “Big Orange Cat” suddenly reappearing out of nowhere since those frightening Cold War days at yet another moment of dire peril between Russia and the United States, makes it more than understandable why it’s mentioned in this transcript by Russians, whose “avos” philosophy of fate counts on such things like this for good outcomes as much as facts—and is an “avos” sense of fate coming at the same time it’s being noticed that the Chinese New Year starts on 1 February 2022 to being “The Year Of The Tiger”. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]https://www.brighteon.com/embed/b1c4e280-af31-4289-9166-09569648e155https://www.brighteon.com/embed/c18fbdb9-1e44-4afa-b9f7-243aebdb9506
February 1, 2022 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]
Nothing here to see
If it isn’t natural, if it does not come from earth, life, plants, animals……….. don’t be putting it in your body! Native Americans and other people living directly off the land used nature for their medicine and cures. If it isn’t natural do not put it in your body! Some of our meds do come […]THE WORD NATURAL, COMING FROM NATURE, BIRTH (ARLIN REPORT THOUGHT OF THE DAY) — ARLIN REPORT……………….walking this path together
More than 150 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms
It is not unreasonable to conclude that surgical and cloth masks, used as they currently are being used (without other forms of PPE protection), have no impact on controlling the transmission of Covid-19 virus. Current evidence implies that face masks can be actually harmful. The body of evidence indicates that face masks are largely ineffective.
My focus is on COVID face masks and the prevailing science that we have had for nearly 20 months. Yet I wish to address this mask topic at a 50,000-foot level on the lockdown restrictive policies in general. I build on the backs of the fine work done by Gupta, Kulldorff, and Bhattacharya on the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) and similar impetus by Dr. Scott Atlas (advisor to POTUS Trump) who, like myself, was a strong proponent for a focused type of protection that was based on an age-risk stratified approach.
Because we saw very early on that the lockdowns were the single greatest mistake in public health history. We knew the history and knew they would not work. We also knew very early of COVID’s risk stratification. Sadly, our children will bear the catastrophic consequences and not just educationally, of the deeply flawed school closure policy for decades to come (particularly our minority children who were least able to afford this). Many are still pressured to wear masks and punished for not doing so.
I present the masking ‘body of evidence’ below (n=167 studies and pieces of evidence), comprised of comparative effectiveness research as well as related evidence and high-level reporting. To date, the evidence has been stable and clear that masks do not work to control the virus and they can be harmful and especially to children.
Table 1: The evidence on COVID-19 face masks and mask mandates and harms
|1) Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers, Bundgaard, 2021||“Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%). The between-group difference was −0.3 percentage point (95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4 percentage point; P = 0.38) (odds ratio, 0.82 [CI, 0.54 to 1.23]; P = 0.33). Multiple imputation accounting for loss to follow-up yielded similar results…the recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use.”|
|2) SARS-CoV-2 Transmission among Marine Recruits during Quarantine, Letizia, 2020||“Our study showed that in a group of predominantly young male military recruits, approximately 2% became positive for SARS-CoV-2, as determined by qPCR assay, during a 2-week, strictly enforced quarantine. Multiple, independent virus strain transmission clusters were identified…all recruits wore double-layered cloth masks at all times indoors and outdoors.”|
|3) Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses, Jefferson, 2020||“There is low certainty evidence from nine trials (3507 participants) that wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask (risk ratio (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.18. There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.26; 6 trials; 3005 participants)…the pooled results of randomised trials did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seasonal influenza.”|
|4) The Impact of Community Masking on COVID-19: A Cluster-Randomized Trial in Bangladesh, Abaluck, 2021|
Heneghan et al.
|A cluster-randomized trial of community-level mask promotion in rural Bangladesh from November 2020 to April 2021 (N=600 villages, N=342,126 adults. Heneghan writes: “In a Bangladesh study, surgical masks reduced symptomatic COVID infections by between 0 and 22 percent, while the efficacy of cloth masks led to somewhere between an 11 percent increase to a 21 percent decrease. Hence, based on these randomized studies, adult masks appear to have either no or limited efficacy.”|
|5) Evidence for Community Cloth Face Masking to Limit the Spread of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review, Liu/CATO, 2021||“The available clinical evidence of facemask efficacy is of low quality and the best available clinical evidence has mostly failed to show efficacy, with fourteen of sixteen identified randomized controlled trials comparing face masks to no mask controls failing to find statistically significant benefit in the intent-to-treat populations. Of sixteen quantitative meta-analyses, eight were equivocal or critical as to whether evidence supports a public recommendation of masks, and the remaining eight supported a public mask intervention on limited evidence primarily on the basis of the precautionary principle.”|
|6) Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures, CDC/Xiao, 2020||“Evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza…none of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group…the overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies.”|
|7) CIDRAP: Masks-for-all for COVID-19 not based on sound data, Brosseau, 2020||“We agree that the data supporting the effectiveness of a cloth mask or face covering are very limited. We do, however, have data from laboratory studies that indicate cloth masks or face coverings offer very low filter collection efficiency for the smaller inhalable particles we believe are largely responsible for transmission, particularly from pre- or asymptomatic individuals who are not coughing or sneezing…though we support mask wearing by the general public, we continue to conclude that cloth masks and face coverings are likely to have limited impact on lowering COVID-19 transmission, because they have minimal ability to prevent the emission of small particles, offer limited personal protection with respect to small particle inhalation, and should not be recommended as a replacement for physical distancing or reducing time in enclosed spaces with many potentially infectious people.”|
|8) Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era, Klompas/NEJM, 2020||“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic…The calculus may be different, however, in health care settings. First and foremost, a mask is a core component of the personal protective equipment (PPE) clinicians need when caring for symptomatic patients with respiratory viral infections, in conjunction with gown, gloves, and eye protection…universal masking alone is not a panacea. A mask will not protect providers caring for a patient with active Covid-19 if it’s not accompanied by meticulous hand hygiene, eye protection, gloves, and a gown. A mask alone will not prevent health care workers with early Covid-19 from contaminating their hands and spreading the virus to patients and colleagues. Focusing on universal masking alone may, paradoxically, lead to more transmission of Covid-19 if it diverts attention from implementing more fundamental infection-control measures.”|
|9) Masks for prevention of viral respiratory infections among health care workers and the public: PEER umbrella systematic review, Dugré, 2020||“This systematic review found limited evidence that the use of masks might reduce the risk of viral respiratory infections. In the community setting, a possible reduced risk of influenza-like illness was found among mask users. In health care workers, the results show no difference between N95 masks and surgical masks on the risk of confirmed influenza or other confirmed viral respiratory infections, although possible benefits from N95 masks were found for preventing influenza-like illness or other clinical respiratory infections. Surgical masks might be superior to cloth masks but data are limited to 1 trial.”|
|10) Effectiveness of personal protective measures in reducing pandemic influenza transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Saunders-Hastings, 2017||“Facemask use provided a non-significant protective effect (OR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.16–1.71; I2 = 48%) against 2009 pandemic influenza infection.”|
|11) Experimental investigation of indoor aerosol dispersion and accumulation in the context of COVID-19: Effects of masks and ventilation, Shah, 2021||“Nevertheless, high-efficiency masks, such as the KN95, still offer substantially higher apparent filtration efficiencies (60% and 46% for R95 and KN95 masks, respectively) than the more commonly used cloth (10%) and surgical masks (12%), and therefore are still the recommended choice in mitigating airborne disease transmission indoors.”|
|12) Exercise with facemask; Are we handling a devil’s sword?- A physiological hypothesis, Chandrasekaran, 2020||“Exercising with facemasks may reduce available Oxygen and increase air trapping preventing substantial carbon dioxide exchange. The hypercapnic hypoxia may potentially increase acidic environment, cardiac overload, anaerobic metabolism and renal overload, which may substantially aggravate the underlying pathology of established chronic diseases. Further contrary to the earlier thought, no evidence exists to claim the facemasks during exercise offer additional protection from the droplet transfer of the virus.”|
|13) Surgical face masks in modern operating rooms–a costly and unnecessary ritual?, Mitchell, 1991||“Following the commissioning of a new suite of operating rooms air movement studies showed a flow of air away from the operating table towards the periphery of the room. Oral microbial flora dispersed by unmasked male and female volunteers standing one metre from the table failed to contaminate exposed settle plates placed on the table. The wearing of face masks by non-scrubbed staff working in an operating room with forced ventilation seems to be unnecessary.”|
|14) Facemask against viral respiratory infections among Hajj pilgrims: A challenging cluster-randomized trial, Alfelali, 2020||“By intention-to-treat analysis, facemask use did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 2.1, p = 0.18) nor against clinical respiratory infection (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4, p = 0.40).”|
|15) Simple respiratory protection–evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles, Rengasamy, 2010||“Results obtained in the study show that common fabric materials may provide marginal protection against nanoparticles including those in the size ranges of virus-containing particles in exhaled breath.”|
|16) Respiratory performance offered by N95 respirators and surgical masks: human subject evaluation with NaCl aerosol representing bacterial and viral particle size range, Lee, 2008||“The study indicates that N95 filtering facepiece respirators may not achieve the expected protection level against bacteria and viruses. An exhalation valve on the N95 respirator does not affect the respiratory protection; it appears to be an appropriate alternative to reduce the breathing resistance.”|
|17) Aerosol penetration and leakage characteristics of masks used in the health care industry, Weber, 1993||“We conclude that the protection provided by surgical masks may be insufficient in environments containing potentially hazardous sub-micrometer-sized aerosols.”|
|18) Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery, Vincent, 2016||“We included three trials, involving a total of 2106 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials…from the limited results it is unclear whether the wearing of surgical face masks by members of the surgical team has any impact on surgical wound infection rates for patients undergoing clean surgery.”|
|19) Disposable surgical face masks: a systematic review, Lipp, 2005||“From the limited results it is unclear whether wearing surgical face masks results in any harm or benefit to the patient undergoing clean surgery.”|
|20) Comparison of the Filter Efficiency of Medical Nonwoven Fabrics against Three Different Microbe Aerosols, Shimasaki , 2018||“We conclude that the filter efficiency test using the phi-X174 phage aerosol may overestimate the protective performance of nonwoven fabrics with filter structure compared to that against real pathogens such as the influenza virus.”|
|21) The use of masks and respirators to preventtransmission of inﬂuenza: a systematic review of thescientiﬁc evidence21) The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence, Bin-Reza, 2012||The use of masks and respirators to preventtransmission of inﬂuenza: a systematic review of thescientiﬁc evidence“None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection. Some evidence suggests that mask use is best undertaken as part of a package of personal protection especially hand hygiene.”|
|22) Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review, Godoy, 2020||“Compared with surgical masks, N95 respirators perform better in laboratory testing, may provide superior protection in inpatient settings and perform equivalently in outpatient settings. Surgical mask and N95 respirator conservation strategies include extended use, reuse or decontamination, but these strategies may result in inferior protection. Limited evidence suggests that reused and improvised masks should be used when medical-grade protection is unavailable.”|
|23) Assessment of Proficiency of N95 Mask Donning Among the General Public in Singapore, Yeung, 2020||“These findings support ongoing recommendations against the use of N95 masks by the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic.5 N95 mask use by the general public may not translate into effective protection but instead provide false reassurance. Beyond N95 masks, proficiency among the general public in donning surgical masks needs to be assessed.”|
|24) Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure, Shakya, 2017||“Standard N95 mask performance was used as a control to compare the results with cloth masks, and our results suggest that cloth masks are only marginally beneficial in protecting individuals from particles<2.5 μm.”|
|25) Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial, Jacobs, 2009||“Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.”|
|26) N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel, Radonovich, 2019||“Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”|
|27) Does Universal Mask Wearing Decrease or Increase the Spread of COVID-19?, Watts up with that? 2020||“A survey of peer-reviewed studies shows that universal mask wearing (as opposed to wearing masks in specific settings) does not decrease the transmission of respiratory viruses from people wearing masks to people who are not wearing masks.”|
|28) Masking: A Careful Review of the Evidence, Alexander, 2021||“In fact, it is not unreasonable at this time to conclude that surgical and cloth masks, used as they currently are, have absolutely no impact on controlling the transmission of Covid-19 virus, and current evidence implies that face masks can be actually harmful.”|
|29) Community and Close Contact Exposures Associated with COVID-19 Among Symptomatic Adults ≥18 Years in 11 Outpatient Health Care Facilities — United States, July 2020, Fisher, 2020||Reported characteristics of symptomatic adults ≥18 years who were outpatients in 11 US academic health care facilities and who received positive and negative SARS-CoV-2 test results (N = 314)* — United States, July 1–29, 2020, revealed that 80% of infected persons wore face masks almost all or most of the time.|
|30) Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 in Europe: a quasi-experimental study, Hunter, 2020||Face masks in public was not associated with reduced incidence.|
|31) Masking lack of evidence with politics, CEBM, Heneghan, 2020||“It would appear that despite two decades of pandemic preparedness, there is considerable uncertainty as to the value of wearing masks. For instance, high rates of infection with cloth masks could be due to harms caused by cloth masks, or benefits of medical masks. The numerous systematic reviews that have been recently published all include the same evidence base so unsurprisingly broadly reach the same conclusions.”|
|32) Transmission of COVID-19 in 282 clusters in Catalonia, Spain: a cohort study, Marks, 2021||“We observed no association of risk of transmission with reported mask usage by contacts, with the age or sex of the index case, or with the presence of respiratory symptoms in the index case at the initial study visit.”|
|33) Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza, WHO, 2020||“Ten RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, and there was no evidence that face masks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”|
|34) The Strangely Unscientific Masking of America, Younes, 2020||“One report reached its conclusion based on observations of a “dummy head attached to a breathing simulator.” Another analyzed use of surgical masks on people experiencing at least two symptoms of acute respiratory illness. Incidentally, not one of these studies involved cloth masks or accounted for real-world mask usage (or misusage) among lay people, and none established efficacy of widespread mask-wearing by people not exhibiting symptoms. There was simply no evidence whatsoever that healthy people ought to wear masks when going about their lives, especially outdoors.”|
|35) Facemasks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID-19: A rapid systematic review, Brainard, 2020||“31 eligible studies (including 12 RCTs). Narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analysis of attack rates for primary and secondary prevention in 28 studies were performed. Based on the RCTs we would conclude that wearing facemasks can be very slightly protective against primary infection from casual community contact, and modestly protective against household infections when both infected and uninfected members wear facemasks. However, the RCTs often suffered from poor compliance and controls using facemasks.”|
|36) The Year of Disguises, Koops, 2020||“The healthy people in our society should not be punished for being healthy, which is exactly what lockdowns, distancing, mask mandates, etc. do…Children should not be wearing face coverings. We all need constant interaction with our environments and that is especially true for children. This is how their immune system develops. They are the lowest of the low-risk groups. Let them be kids and let them develop their immune systems… The “Mask Mandate” idea is a truly ridiculous, knee-jerk reaction and needs to be withdrawn and thrown in the waste bin of disastrous policy, along with lockdowns and school closures. You can vote for a person without blindly supporting all of their proposals!”|
|37) Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden, Ludvigsson, 2020||“1,951,905 children in Sweden (as of December 31, 2019) who were 1 to 16 years of age, were examined…social distancing was encouraged in Sweden, but wearing face masks was not…No child with Covid-19 died.”|
|38) Double-Masking Benefits Are Limited, Japan Supercomputer Finds, Reidy, 2021||“Wearing two masks offers limited benefits in preventing the spread of droplets that could carry the coronavirus compared to one well-fitted disposable mask, according to a Japanese study that modeled the dispersal of droplets on a supercomputer.”|
|39) Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Part 1 – Face masks, eye protection and person distancing: systematic review and meta-analysis, Jefferson, 2020||“There was insufficient evidence to provide a recommendation on the use of facial barriers without other measures. We found insufficient evidence for a difference between surgical masks and N95 respirators and limited evidence to support effectiveness of quarantine.”|
|40) Should individuals in the community without respiratory symptoms wear facemasks to reduce the spread of COVID-19?, NIPH, 2020||“Non-medical facemasks include a variety of products. There is no reliable evidence of the effectiveness of non-medical facemasks in community settings. There is likely to be substantial variation in effectiveness between products. However, there is only limited evidence from laboratory studies of potential differences in effectiveness when different products are used in the community.”|
|41) Is a mask necessary in the operating theatre?, Orr, 1981||“It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all but operating in silence. Whatever its relation to contamination, bacterial counts, or the dissemination of squames, there is no direct evidence that the wearing of masks reduces wound infection.”|
|42) The surgical mask is a bad fit for risk reduction, Neilson, 2016||“As recently as 2010, the US National Academy of Sciences declared that, in the community setting, “face masks are not designed or certified to protect the wearer from exposure to respiratory hazards.” A number of studies have shown the inefficacy of the surgical mask in household settings to prevent transmission of the influenza virus.”|
|43) Facemask versus No Facemask in Preventing Viral Respiratory Infections During Hajj: A Cluster Randomised Open Label Trial, Alfelali, 2019||“Facemask use does not prevent clinical or laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections among Hajj pilgrims.”|
|44) Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis, Vainshelboim, 2021||“The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression.”|
|45) The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence, Bin-Reza, 2011||“None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection. Some evidence suggests that mask use is best undertaken as part of a package of personal protection especially hand hygiene.”|
|46) Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence., Swiss Policy Research, 2021||“Most studies found little to no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks in the general population, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.”|
|47) Postoperative wound infections and surgical face masks: A controlled study, Tunevall, 1991||“These results indicate that the use of face masks might be reconsidered. Masks may be used to protect the operating team from drops of infected blood and from airborne infections, but have not been proven to protect the patient operated by a healthy operating team.”|
|48) Mask mandate and use efficacy in state-level COVID-19 containment, Guerra, 2021||“Mask mandates and use are not associated with slower state-level COVID-19 spread during COVID-19 growth surges.”|
|49) Twenty Reasons Mandatory Face Masks are Unsafe, Ineffective and Immoral, Manley, 2021||“A CDC-funded review on masking in May 2020 came to the conclusion: “Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza… None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group.” If masks can’t stop the regular flu, how can they stop SAR-CoV-2?”|
|50) A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers, MacIntyre, 2015||“First RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection…the rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.”|
|51) Horowitz: Data from India continues to blow up the ‘Delta’ fear narrative, Blazemedia, 2021||“Rather than proving the need to sow more panic, fear, and control over people, the story from India — the source of the “Delta” variant — continues to refute every current premise of COVID fascism…Masks failed to stop the spread there.”|
|52) An outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (B.1.617.2) in a secondary care hospital in Finland, May 2021, Hetemäki, 2021||Reporting on a nosocomial hospital outbreak in Finland, Hetemäli et al. observed that “both symptomatic and asymptomatic infections were found among vaccinated health care workers, and secondary transmission occurred from those with symptomatic infections despite use of personal protective equipment.”|
|53) Nosocomial outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a highly vaccinated population, Israel, July 2021, Shitrit, 2021||In a hospital outbreak investigation in Israel, Shitrit et al. observed “high transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant among twice vaccinated and masked individuals.” They added that “this suggests some waning of immunity, albeit still providing protection for individuals without comorbidities.” Again, despite use of personal protective equipment.|
|54) 47 studies confirm ineffectiveness of masks for COVID and 32 more confirm their negative health effects, Lifesite news staff, 2021||“No studies were needed to justify this practice since most understood viruses were far too small to be stopped by the wearing of most masks, other than sophisticated ones designed for that task and which were too costly and complicated for the general public to properly wear and keep changing or cleaning. It was also understood that long mask wearing was unhealthy for wearers for common sense and basic science reasons.”|
|55) Are EUA Face Masks Effective in Slowing the Spread of a Viral Infection?, Dopp, 2021||The vast evidence shows that masks are ineffective.|
|56) CDC Study finds overwhelming majority of people getting coronavirus wore masks, Boyd/Federalist, 2021||“A Centers for Disease Control report released in September shows that masks and face coverings are not effective in preventing the spread of COVID-19, even for those people who consistently wear them.”|
|57) Most Mask Studies Are Garbage, Eugyppius, 2021||“The other kind of study, the proper kind, would be a randomised controlled trial. You compare the rates of infection in a masked cohort against rates of infection in an unmasked cohort. Here things have gone much, much worse for mask brigade. They spent months trying to prevent the publication of the Danish randomised controlled trial, which found that masks do zero. When that paper finally squeaked into print, they spent more months trying desperately to poke holes in it. You could feel their boundless relief when the Bangladesh study finally appeared to save them in early September. Every last Twitter blue-check could now proclaim that Science Shows Masks Work. Such was their hunger for any scrap of evidence to prop up their prior convictions, that none of them noticed the sad nature of the Science in question. The study found a mere 10% reduction in seroprevalence among the masked cohort, an effect so small that it fell within the confidence interval. Even the study authors couldn’t exclude the possibility that masks in fact do zero.”|
|58) Using face masks in the community: first update, ECDC, 2021||“No high-quality evidence in favor of face masks and recommended their use only based on the ‘precautionary principle.”|
|59) Do physical measures such as hand-washing or wearing masks stop or slow down the spread of respiratory viruses?, Cochrane, 2020||“Seven studies took place in the community, and two studies in healthcare workers. Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illness (9 studies; 3507 people); and probably makes no difference in how many people have flu confirmed by a laboratory test (6 studies; 3005 people). Unwanted effects were rarely reported, but included discomfort.”|
|60) Mouth-nose protection in public: No evidence of effectiveness, Thieme/ Kappstein, 2020||“The use of masks in public spaces is questionable simply because of the lack of scientific data. If one also considers the necessary precautions, masks must even be considered a risk of infection in public spaces according to the rules known from hospitals… If masks are worn by the population, the risk of infection is potentially increased, regardless of whether they are medical masks or whether they are so-called community masks designed in any way. If one considers the precautionary measures that the RKI as well as the international health authorities have pronounced, all authorities would even have to inform the population that masks should not be worn in public spaces at all. Because no matter whether it is a duty for all citizens or voluntarily borne by the citizens who want it for whatever reason, it remains a fact that masks can do more harm than good in public.”|
|61) US mask guidance for kids is the strictest across the world, Skelding, 2021||“Kids need to see faces,” Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford University, told The Post. Youngsters watch people’s mouths to learn to speak, read and understand emotions, he said.“We have this idea that this disease is so bad that we must adopt any means necessary to stop it from spreading,” he said. “It’s not that masks in schools have no costs. They actually do have substantial costs.”|
|62) Masking young children in school harms language acquisition, Walsh, 2021||“This is important because children and/or students do not have the speech or language ability that adults have — they are not equally able and the ability to see the face and especially the mouth is critical to language acquisition which children and/or students are engaged in at all times. Furthermore, the ability to see the mouth is not only essential to communication but also essential to brain development.”|
|63) The Case Against Masks for Children, Makary, 2021||“It’s abusive to force kids who struggle with them to sacrifice for the sake of unvaccinated adults… Do masks reduce Covid transmission in children? Believe it or not, we could find only a single retrospective study on the question, and its results were inconclusive. Yet two weeks ago the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sternly decreed that 56 million U.S. children and adolescents, vaccinated or not, should cover their faces regardless of the prevalence of infection in their community. Authorities in many places took the cue to impose mandates in schools and elsewhere, on the theory that masks can’t do any harm. That isn’t true. Some children are fine wearing a mask, but others struggle. Those who have myopia can have difficulty seeing because the mask fogs their glasses. (This has long been a problem for medical students in the operating room.) Masks can cause severe acne and other skin problems. The discomfort of a mask distracts some children from learning. By increasing airway resistance during exhalation, masks can lead to increased levels of carbon dioxide in the blood. And masks can be vectors for pathogens if they become moist or are used for too long.”|
|64) Face Covering Mandates, Peavey, 2021||“Face Covering Mandates And Why They AREN’T Effective.”|
|65) Do masks work? A Review of the evidence, Anderson, 2021||“In truth, the CDC’s, U.K.’s, and WHO’s earlier guidance was much more consistent with the best medical research on masks’ effectiveness in preventing the spread of viruses. That research suggests that Americans’ many months of mask-wearing has likely provided little to no health benefit and might even have been counterproductive in preventing the spread of the novel coronavirus.”|
|66) Most face masks won’t stop COVID-19 indoors, study warns, Anderer, 2021||“New research reveals that cloth masks filter just 10% of exhaled aerosols, with many people not wearing coverings that fit their face properly.”|
|67) How face masks and lockdowns failed/the face mask folly in retrospect, Swiss Policy Research, 2021||“Mask mandates and lockdowns have had no discernible impact.”|
|68) CDC Releases School COVID Transmission Study But Buries One of the Most Damning Parts, Davis, 2021||“The 21% lower incidence in schools that required mask use among students was not statistically significant compared with schools where mask use was optional… With tens of millions of American kids headed back to school in the fall, their parents and political leaders owe it to them to have a clear-sighted, scientifically rigorous discussion about which anti-COVID measures actually work and which might put an extra burden on vulnerable young people without meaningfully or demonstrably slowing the spread of the virus…that a masking requirement of students failed to show independent benefit is a finding of consequence and great interest.”|
|69) World Health Organization internal meeting, COVID-19 – virtual press conference – 30 March 2020, 2020||“This is a question on Austria. The Austrian Government has a desire to make everyone wear a mask who’s going into the shops. I understood from our previous briefings with you that the general public should not wear masks because they are in short supply. What do you say about the new Austrian measures?… I’m not specifically aware of that measure in Austria. I would assume that it’s aimed at people who potentially have the disease not passing it to others. In general WHO recommends that the wearing of a mask by a member of the public is to prevent that individual giving the disease to somebody else. We don’t generally recommend the wearing to masks in public by otherwise well individuals because it has not been up to now associated with any particular benefit.”|
|70) Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review, Cowling, 2010||“Review highlights the limited evidence base supporting the efficacy or effectiveness of face masks to reduce influenza virus transmission.”“None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H).”|
|71) Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Smith, 2016||“Although N95 respirators appeared to have a protective advantage over surgical masks in laboratory settings, our meta-analysis showed that there were insufficient data to determine definitively whether N95 respirators are superior to surgical masks in protecting health care workers against transmissible acute respiratory infections in clinical settings.”|
|72) Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Offeddu, 2017||“We found evidence to support universal medical mask use in hospital settings as part of infection control measures to reduce the risk of CRI and ILI among HCWs. Overall, N95 respirators may convey greater protection, but universal use throughout a work shift is likely to be less acceptable due to greater discomfort…Our analysis confirms the effectiveness of medical masks and respirators against SARS. Disposable, cotton, or paper masks are not recommended. The confirmed effectiveness of medical masks is crucially important for lower-resource and emergency settings lacking access to N95 respirators. In such cases, single-use medical masks are preferable to cloth masks, for which there is no evidence of protection and which might facilitate transmission of pathogens when used repeatedly without adequate sterilization…We found no clear benefit of either medical masks or N95 respirators against pH1N1…Overall, the evidence to inform policies on mask use in HCWs is poor, with a small number of studies that is prone to reporting biases and lack of statistical power.”|
|73) N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel, Radonovich, 2019||“Use of N95 respirators, compared with medical masks, in the outpatient setting resulted in no significant difference in the rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”|
|Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks againstinfluenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis74) Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy, Rancourt, 2020||The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with alower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza. It suggests that N95 respirators should not be rec-ommended for general public and nonhigh-risk medical staff those are not in close contact withinfluenza patients or suspected patients. “No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW or community members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions. Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public (more on this below). Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit.”|
|75) More Than a Dozen Credible Medical Studies Prove Face Masks Do Not Work Even In Hospitals!, Firstenberg, 2020||“Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them.”|
|76) Does evidence based medicine support the effectiveness of surgical facemasks in preventing postoperative wound infections in elective surgery?, Bahli, 2009||“From the limited randomized trials it is still not clear that whether wearing surgical face masks harms or benefit the patients undergoing elective surgery.”|
|77) Peritonitis prevention in CAPD: to mask or not?, Figueiredo, 2000||“The current study suggests that routine use of face masks during CAPD bag exchanges may be unnecessary and could be discontinued.”|
|78) The operating room environment as affected by people and the surgical face mask, Ritter, 1975||“The wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination and probably work only to redirect the projectile effect of talking and breathing. People are the major source of environmental contamination in the operating room.”|
|79) The efficacy of standard surgical face masks: an investigation using “tracer particles, Ha’eri, 1980||“Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments. Since the microspheres were not identified on the exterior of these face masks, they must have escaped around the mask edges and found their way into the wound.”|
|80) Wearing of caps and masks not necessary during cardiac catheterization, Laslett, 1989||“Prospectively evaluated the experience of 504 patients undergoing percutaneous left heart catheterization, seeking evidence of a relationship between whether caps and/or masks were worn by the operators and the incidence of infection. No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used. Thus, we found no evidence that caps or masks need to be worn during percutaneous cardiac catheterization.”|
|81) Do anaesthetists need to wear surgical masks in the operating theatre? A literature review with evidence-based recommendations, Skinner, 2001||“A questionnaire-based survey, undertaken by Leyland’ in 1993 to assess attitudes to the use of masks, showed that 20% of surgeons discarded surgical masks for endoscopic work. Less than 50% did not wear the mask as recommended by the Medical Research Council. Equal numbers of surgeons wore the mask in the belief they were protecting themselves and the patient, with 20% of these admitting that tradition was the only reason for wearing them.”|
|82) Mask mandates for children are not backed by data, Faria, 2021||“Even if you want to use the 2018-19 flu season to avoid overlap with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC paints a similar picture: It estimated 480 flu deaths among children during that period, with 46,000 hospitalizations. COVID-19, mercifully, is simply not as deadly for children. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, preliminary data from 45 states show that between 0.00%-0.03% of child COVID-19 cases resulted in death. When you combine these numbers with the CDC study that found mask mandates for students — along with hybrid models, social distancing, and classroom barriers — did not have a statistically significant benefit in preventing the spread of COVID-19 in schools, the insistence that we force students to jump through these hoops for their own protection makes no sense.”|
|83) The Downsides of Masking Young Students Are Real, Prasad, 2021||“The benefits of mask requirements in schools might seem self-evident—they have to help contain the coronavirus, right?—but that may not be so. In Spain, masks are used in kids ages 6 and older. The authors of one study there examined the risk of viral spread at all ages. If masks provided a large benefit, then the transmission rate among 5-year-olds would be far higher than the rate among 6-year-olds. The results don’t show that. Instead, they show that transmission rates, which were low among the youngest kids, steadily increased with age—rather than dropping sharply for older children subject to the face-covering requirement. This suggests that masking kids in school does not provide a major benefit and might provide none at all. And yet many officials prefer to double down on masking mandates, as if the fundamental policy were sound and only the people have failed.”|
|84) Masks In Schools: Scientific American Fumbles Report On Childhood COVID Transmission, English/ACSH, 2021||“Masking is a low-risk, inexpensive intervention. If we want to recommend it as a precautionary measure, especially in situations where vaccination isn’t an option, great. But that’s not what the public has been told. “Florida governor Ron DeSantis and politicians in Texas say research does not support mask mandates,” SciAm’s sub-headline bellowed. “Many studies show they are wrong.”If that’s the case, demonstrate that the intervention works before you mandate its use in schools. If you can’t, acknowledged what UC San Francisco hematologist-oncologist and Associate Professor of Epidemiology Vinay Prasad wrote over at the Atlantic:”No scientific consensus exists about the wisdom of mandatory-masking rules for schoolchildren … In mid-March 2020, few could argue against erring on the side of caution. But nearly 18 months later, we owe it to children and their parents to answer the question properly: Do the benefits of masking kids in school outweigh the downsides? The honest answer in 2021 remains that we don’t know for sure.”|
|85) Masks ‘don’t work,’ are damaging health and are being used to control population: Doctors panel, Haynes, 2021||“The only randomized control studies that have ever been done on masks show that they don’t work,” began Dr. Nepute. He referred to Dr. Anthony Fauci’s “noble lie,” in which Fauci “changed his tune,” from his March 2020 comments, where he downplayed the need and efficacy of mask wearing, before urging Americans to use masks later in the year. “Well, he lied to us. So if he lied about that, what else has he lied to you about?” questioned Nepute.Masks have become commonplace in almost every setting, whether indoors or outdoors, but Dr. Popper mentioned how there have been “no studies” which actually examine the “effect of wearing a mask during all your waking hours.”“There’s no science to back any of this and particularly no science to back the fact that wearing a mask twenty four-seven or every waking minute, is health promoting,” added Popper.”|
|86) Aerosol penetration through surgical masks, Chen, 1992||“The mask that has the highest collection efficiency is not necessarily the best mask from the perspective of the filter-quality factor, which considers not only the capture efficiency but also the air resistance. Although surgical mask media may be adequate to remove bacteria exhaled or expelled by health care workers, they may not be sufficient to remove the sub-micrometer-sized aerosols containing pathogens to which these health care workers are potentially exposed.”|
|87) CDC: Schools With Mask Mandates Didn’t See Statistically Significant Different Rates of COVID Transmission From Schools With Optional Policies, Miltimore, 2021||“The CDC did not include its finding that “required mask use among students was not statistically significant compared with schools where mask use was optional” in the summary of its report.”|
|88) Horowitz: Data from India continues to blow up the ‘Delta’ fear narrative, Howorwitz, 2021||“Rather than proving the need to sow more panic, fear, and control over people, the story from India — the source of the “Delta” variant — continues to refute every current premise of COVID fascism…Unless we do that, we must return to the very effective lockdowns and masks. In reality, India’s experience proves the opposite true; namely:1) Delta is largely an attenuated version, with a much lower fatality rate, that for most people is akin to a cold.2) Masks failed to stop the spread there.3) The country has come close to the herd immunity threshold with just 3% vaccinated.|
|89) Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Among Vaccinated Healthcare Workers, Vietnam, Chau, 2021||While not definitive in the LANCET publication, it can be inferred that the nurses were all masked up and had PPE etc. as was the case in Finland and Israel nosocomial outbreaks, indicating the failure of PPE and masks to constrain Delta spread.|
|90) Aerosol penetration through surgical masks, Willeke, 1992||“The mask that has the highest collection efficiency is not necessarily the best mask from the perspective of the filter-quality factor, which considers not only the capture efficiency but also the air resistance. Although surgical mask media may be adequate to remove bacteria exhaled or expelled by health care workers, they may not be sufficient to remove the submicrometer-size aerosols containing pathogens to which these health care workers are potentially exposed.”|
|91) The efficacy of standard surgical face masks: an investigation using “tracer particles”, Wiley, 1980||“Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all aexperiments. Since the microspheres were not identified on the exterior of these face masks, they must have escped around the mask edges and found their way into the wound. The wearing of the mask beneath the headgear curtails this route of contamination.”|
|92) An Evidence Based Scientific Analysis of Why Masks are Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful, Meehan, 2020||“Decades of the highest-level scientific evidence (meta-analyses of multiple randomized controlled trials) overwhelmingly conclude that medical masks are ineffective at preventing the transmission of respiratory viruses, including SAR-CoV-2…those arguing for masks are relying on low-level evidence (observational retrospective trials and mechanistic theories), none of which are powered to counter the evidence, arguments, and risks of mask mandates.”|
|93) Open Letter from Medical Doctors and Health Professionals to All Belgian Authorities and All Belgian Media, AIER, 2020||“Oral masks in healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral infections.”|
|94) Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Long, 2020||“The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza. It suggests that N95 respirators should not be recommended for general public and nonhigh-risk medical staff those are not in close contact with influenza patients or suspected patients.”|
|95) Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19, WHO, 2020||“However, the use of a mask alone is insufficient to provide an adequate level of protection or source control, and other personal and community level measures should also be adopted to suppress transmission of respiratory viruses.”|
|96) Farce mask: it’s safe for only 20 minutes, The Sydney Morning Herald, 2003||“Health authorities have warned that surgical masks may not be an effective protection against the virus.”Those masks are only effective so long as they are dry,” said Professor Yvonne Cossart of the Department of Infectious Diseases at the University of Sydney.”As soon as they become saturated with the moisture in your breath they stop doing their job and pass on the droplets.”Professor Cossart said that could take as little as 15 or 20 minutes, after which the mask would need to be changed. But those warnings haven’t stopped people snapping up the masks, with retailers reporting they are having trouble keeping up with demand.”|
|97) Study: Wearing A Used Mask Is Potentially Riskier Than No Mask At All, Boyd, 2020|
Effects of mask-wearing on the inhalability and deposition of airborne SARS-CoV-2 aerosols in human upper airway
|“According to researchers from the University of Massachusetts Lowell and California Baptist University, a three-layer surgical mask is 65 percent efficient in filtering particles in the air. That effectiveness, however, falls to 25 percent once it is used.“It is natural to think that wearing a mask, no matter new or old, should always be better than nothing,” said author Jinxiang Xi.“Our results show that this belief is only true for particles larger than 5 micrometers, but not for fine particles smaller than 2.5 micrometers,” he continued.”|
|1) Mask mandate and use efficacy for COVID-19 containment in US States, Guerra, 2021||“Calculated total COVID-19 case growth and mask use for the continental United States with data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. We estimated post-mask mandate case growth in non-mandate states using median issuance dates of neighboring states with mandates…did not observe association between mask mandates or use and reduced COVID-19 spread in US states.”|
|2) These 12 Graphs Show Mask Mandates Do Nothing To Stop COVID, Weiss, 2020||“Masks can work well when they’re fully sealed, properly fitted, changed often, and have a filter designed for virus-sized particles. This represents none of the common masks available on the consumer market, making universal masking much more of a confidence trick than a medical solution…Our universal use of unscientific face coverings is therefore closer to medieval superstition than it is to science, but many powerful institutions have too much political capital invested in the mask narrative at this point, so the dogma is perpetuated. The narrative says that if cases go down it’s because masks succeeded. It says that if cases go up it’s because masks succeeded in preventing more cases. The narrative simply assumes rather than proves that masks work, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary.”|
|3) Mask Mandates Seem to Make CCP Virus Infection Rates Climb, Study Says, Vadum, 2020||“Protective-mask mandates aimed at combating the spread of the CCP virus that causes the disease COVID-19 appear to promote its spread, according to a report from RationalGround.com, a clearinghouse of COVID-19 data trends that’s run by a grassroots group of data analysts, computer scientists, and actuaries.”|
|4) Horowitz: Comprehensive analysis of 50 states shows greater spread with mask mandates, Howorwitz, 2020|
|“How long do our politicians get to ignore the results?… The results: When comparing states with mandates vs. those without, or periods of times within a state with a mandate vs. without, there is absolutely no evidence the mask mandate worked to slow the spread one iota. In total, in the states that had a mandate in effect, there were 9,605,256 confirmed COVID cases over 5,907 total days, an average of 27 cases per 100,000 per day. When states did not have a statewide order (which includes the states that never had them and the period of time masking states did not have the mandate in place) there were 5,781,716 cases over 5,772 total days, averaging 17 cases per 100,000 people per day.”|
|5) The CDC’s Mask Mandate Study: Debunked, Alexander, 2021||“Thus, it is not surprising that the CDC’s own recent conclusion on the use of nonpharmaceutical measures such as face masks in pandemic influenza, warned that scientific “evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission…” Moreover, in the WHO’s 2019 guidance document on nonpharmaceutical public health measures in a pandemic, they reported as to face masks that “there is no evidence that this is effective in reducing transmission…” Similarly, in the fine print to a recent double-blind, double-masking simulation the CDC stated that “The findings of these simulations [supporting mask usage] should neither be generalized to the effectiveness …nor interpreted as being representative of the effectiveness of these masks when worn in real-world settings.”|
|6) Phil Kerpin, tweet, 2021|
|“The first ecological study of state mask mandates and use to include winter data: “Case growth was independent of mandates at low and high rates of community spread, and mask use did not predict case growth during the Summer or Fall-Winter waves.”|
|7) How face masks and lockdowns failed, SPR, 2021||“Infections have been driven primarily by seasonal and endemic factors, whereas mask mandates and lockdowns have had no discernible impact”|
|8) Analysis of the Effects of COVID-19 Mask Mandates on Hospital Resource Consumption and Mortality at the County Level, Schauer, 2021||“There was no reduction in per-population daily mortality, hospital bed, ICU bed, or ventilator occupancy of COVID-19-positive patients attributable to the implementation of a mask-wearing mandate.”|
|9) Do we need mask mandates, Harris, 2021||“But masks proved far less useful in the subsequent 1918 Spanish flu, a viral disease spread by pathogens smaller than bacteria. California’s Department of Health, for instance, reported that the cities of Stockton, which required masks, and Boston, which did not, had scarcely different death rates, and so advised against mask mandates except for a few high-risk professions such as barbers….Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mask use, generally more reliable than observational studies, though not infallible, typically show that cloth and surgical masks offer little protection. A few RCTs suggest that perfect adherence to an exacting mask protocol may guard against influenza, but meta-analyses find little on the whole to suggest that masks offer meaningful protection. WHO guidelines from 2019 on influenza say that despite “mechanistic plausibility for the potential effectiveness” of masks, studies showed a benefit too small to be established with any certainty. Another literature review by researchers from the University of Hong Kong agrees. Its best estimate for the protective effect of surgical masks against influenza, based on ten RCTs published through 2018, was just 22 percent, and it could not rule out zero effect.”|
|1) Corona children studies: Co-Ki: First results of a German-wide registry on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children, Schwarz, 2021||“The average wearing time of the mask was 270 minutes per day. Impairments caused by wearing the mask were reported by 68% of the parents. These included irritability (60%), headache (53%), difficulty concentrating (50%), less happiness (49%), reluctance to go to school/kindergarten (44%), malaise (42%) impaired learning (38%) and drowsiness or fatigue (37%).”|
|2) Dangerous pathogens found on children’s face masks, Cabrera, 2021||“Masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria.”|
|3) Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 2: Microbial challenges from masks, Borovoy, 2020/2021||“Laboratory testing of used masks from 20 train commuters revealed that 11 of the 20 masks tested contained over 100,000 bacterial colonies. Molds and yeasts were also found. Three of the masks contained more than one million bacterial colonies… The outside surfaces of surgical masks were found to have high levels of the following microbes, even in hospitals, more concentrated on the outside of masks than in the environment. Staphylococcus species (57%) and Pseudomonas spp (38%) were predominant among bacteria, and Penicillium spp (39%) and Aspergillus spp. (31%) were the predominant fungi.”|
|4) Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery, Beder, 2008||“Considering our findings, pulse rates of the surgeon’s increase and SpO2 decrease after the first hour. This early change in SpO2 may be either due to the facial mask or the operational stress. Since a very small decrease in saturation at this level, reflects a large decrease in PaO2, our findings may have a clinical value for the health workers and the surgeons.”|
|5) Mask mandates may affect a child’s emotional, intellectual development, Gillis, 2020||“The thing is we really don’t know for sure what the effect may or may not be. But what we do know is that children, especially in early childhood, they use the mouth as part of the entire face to get a sense of what’s going on around them in terms of adults and other people in their environment as far as their emotions. It also has a role in language development as well… If you think about an infant, when you interact with them you use part of your mouth. They are interested in your facial expressions. And if you think about that part of the face being covered up, there is that possibility that it could have an effect. But we don’t know because this is really an unprecedented time. What we wonder about is if this could play a role and how can we stop it if it would affect child development.”|
|6) Headaches and the N95 face-mask amongst healthcare providers, Lim, 2006||“Healthcare providers may develop headaches following the use of the N95 face-mask.”|
|7) Maximizing Fit for Cloth and Medical Procedure Masks to Improve Performance and Reduce SARS-CoV-2 Transmission and Exposure, 2021, Brooks, 2021||“Although use of double masking or knotting and tucking are two of many options that can optimize fit and enhance mask performance for source control and for wearer protection, double masking might impede breathing or obstruct peripheral vision for some wearers, and knotting and tucking can change the shape of the mask such that it no longer covers fully both the nose and the mouth of persons with larger faces.”|
|8) Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis, Vainshelboim, 2021||“Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression.”|
|9) Wearing a mask can expose children to dangerous levels of carbon dioxide in just THREE MINUTES, study finds, Shaheen/Daily Mail, 2021||“European study found that children wearing masks for only minutes could be exposed to dangerous carbon dioxide levels…Forty-five children were exposed to carbon dioxide levels between three to twelve times healthy levels.”|
|10) How many children must die? Shilhavy, 2020||“How long are parents going to continue masking their children causing great harm to them, even to the point of risking their lives? Dr. Eric Nepute in St. Louis took time to record a video rant that he wants everyone to share, after the 4-year-old child of one of his patients almost died from a bacterial lung infection caused by prolonged mask use.”|
|11) Medical Doctor Warns that “Bacterial Pneumonias Are on the Rise” from Mask Wearing, Meehan, 2021||“I’m seeing patients that have facial rashes, fungal infections, bacterial infections. Reports coming from my colleagues, all over the world, are suggesting that the bacterial pneumonias are on the rise…Why might that be? Because untrained members of the public are wearing medical masks, repeatedly… in a non-sterile fashion… They’re becoming contaminated. They’re pulling them off of their car seat, off the rear-view mirror, out of their pocket, from their countertop, and they’re reapplying a mask that should be worn fresh and sterile every single time.”|
|12) Open Letter from Medical Doctors and Health Professionals to All Belgian Authorities and All Belgian Media, AIER, 2020||“Wearing a mask is not without side effects. Oxygen deficiency (headache, nausea, fatigue, loss of concentration) occurs fairly quickly, an effect similar to altitude sickness. Every day we now see patients complaining of headaches, sinus problems, respiratory problems and hyperventilation due to wearing masks. In addition, the accumulated CO2 leads to a toxic acidification of the organism which affects our immunity. Some experts even warn of an increased transmission of the virus in case of inappropriate use of the mask.”|
|13) Face coverings for covid-19: from medical intervention to social practice, Peters, 2020||“At present, there is no direct evidence (from studies on Covid19 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including Covid19. Contamination of the upper respiratory tract by viruses and bacteria on the outside of medical face masks has been detected in several hospitals. Another research shows that a moist mask is a breeding ground for (antibiotic resistant) bacteria and fungi, which can undermine mucosal viral immunity. This research advocates the use of medical / surgical masks (instead of homemade cotton masks) that are used once and replaced after a few hours.”|
|14) Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis, Lazzarino, 2020||“The two potential side effects that have already been acknowledged are: (1) Wearing a face mask may give a false sense of security and make people adopt a reduction in compliance with other infection control measures, including social distancing and hands washing. (2) Inappropriate use of face mask: people must not touch their masks, must change their single-use masks frequently or wash them regularly, dispose them correctly and adopt other management measures, otherwise their risks and those of others may increase. Other potential side effects that we must consider are: (3) The quality and the volume of speech between two people wearing masks is considerably compromised and they may unconsciously come closer. While one may be trained to counteract side effect n.1, this side effect may be more difficult to tackle. (4) Wearing a face mask makes the exhaled air go into the eyes. This generates an uncomfortable feeling and an impulse to touch your eyes. If your hands are contaminated, you are infecting yourself.”|
|15) Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers, Chughtai, 2019||“Respiratory pathogens on the outer surface of the used medical masks may result in self-contamination. The risk is higher with longer duration of mask use (> 6 h) and with higher rates of clinical contact. Protocols on duration of mask use should specify a maximum time of continuous use, and should consider guidance in high contact settings.”|
|16) Reusability of Facemasks During an Influenza Pandemic, Bailar, 2006||“After considering all the testimony and other information we received, the committee concluded that there is currently no simple, reliable way to decontaminate these devices and enable people to use them safely more than once. There is relatively little data available about how effective these devices are against flu even the first time they are used. To the extent they can help at all, they must be used correctly, and the best respirator or mask will do little to protect a person who uses it incorrectly. Substantial research must be done to increase our understanding of how flu spreads, to develop better masks and respirators, and to make it easier to decontaminate them. Finally, the use of face coverings is only one of many strategies that will be needed to slow or halt a pandemic, and people should not engage in activities that would increase their risk of exposure to flu just because they have a mask or respirator.”|
|17) Exhalation of respiratory viruses by breathing, coughing, and talking, Stelzer-Braid, 2009||“The exhaled aerosols generated by coughing, talking, and breathing were sampled in 50 subjects using a novel mask, and analyzed using PCR for nine respiratory viruses. The exhaled samples from a subset of 10 subjects who were PCR positive for rhinovirus were also examined by cell culture for this virus. Of the 50 subjects, among the 33 with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections, 21 had at least one virus detected by PCR, while amongst the 17 asymptomatic subjects, 4 had a virus detected by PCR. Overall, rhinovirus was detected in 19 subjects, influenza in 4 subjects, parainfluenza in 2 subjects, and human metapneumovirus in 1 subject. Two subjects were co-infected. Of the 25 subjects who had virus-positive nasal mucus, the same virus type was detected in 12 breathing samples, 8 talking samples, and in 2 coughing samples. In the subset of exhaled samples from 10 subjects examined by culture, infective rhinovirus was detected in 2.”|
|18) [Effect of a surgical mask on six minute walking distance], Person, 2018||“Wearing a surgical mask modifies significantly and clinically dyspnea without influencing walked distance.”|
|19) Protective masks reduce resilience, Science ORF, 2020||“The German researchers used two types of face masks for their study – surgical masks and so-called FFP2 masks, which are mainly used by medical personnel. The measurements were carried out with the help of spiroergometry, in which patients or in this case the test persons exert themselves physically on a stationary bicycle – a so-called ergometer – or a treadmill. The subjects were examined without a mask, with surgical masks and with FFP2 masks. The masks therefore impair breathing, especially the volume and the highest possible speed of the air when exhaling. The maximum possible force on the ergometer was significantly reduced.”|
|20) Wearing masks even more unhealthy than expected, Coronoa transition, 2020||“They contain microplastics – and they exacerbate the waste problem…”Many of them are made of polyester and so you have a microplastic problem.” Many of the face masks would contain polyester with chlorine compounds: “If I have the mask in front of my face, then of course I breathe in the microplastic directly and these substances are much more toxic than if you swallow them, as they get directly into the nervous system,” Braungart continues.”|
|21) Masking Children: Tragic, Unscientific, and Damaging, Alexander, 2021||“Children do not readily acquire SARS-CoV-2 (very low risk), spread it to other children or teachers, or endanger parents or others at home. This is the settled science. In the rare cases where a child contracts Covid virus it is very unusual for the child to get severely ill or die. Masking can do positive harm to children – as it can to some adults. But the cost benefit analysis is entirely different for adults and children – particularly younger children. Whatever arguments there may be for consenting adults – children should not be required to wear masks to prevent the spread of Covid-19. Of course, zero risk is not attainable – with or without masks, vaccines, therapeutics, distancing or anything else medicine may develop or government agencies may impose.”|
|22) The Dangers of Masks, Alexander, 2021||“With that clarion call, we pivot and refer here to another looming concern and this is the potential danger of the chlorine, polyester, and microplastic components of the face masks (surgical principally but any of the mass-produced masks) that have become part of our daily lives due to the Covid-19 pandemic. We hope those with persuasive power in the government will listen to this plea. We hope that the necessary decisions will be made to reduce the risk to our populations.”|
|23) 13-year-old mask wearer dies for inexplicable reasons, Corona Transition, 2020||“The case is not only causing speculation in Germany about possible poisoning with carbon dioxide. Because the student “was wearing a corona protective mask when she suddenly collapsed and died a little later in the hospital,” writes Wochenblick.Editor’s Review: The fact that no cause of death was communicated nearly three weeks after the girl’s death is indeed unusual. The carbon dioxide content of the air is usually about 0.04 percent. From a proportion of four percent, the first symptoms of hypercapnia, i.e. carbon dioxide poisoning, appear. If the proportion of the gas rises to more than 20 percent, there is a risk of deadly carbon dioxide poisoning. However, this does not come without alarm signals from the body. According to the medical portal netdoktor, these include “sweating, accelerated breathing, accelerated heartbeat, headaches, confusion, loss of consciousness”. The unconsciousness of the girl could therefore be an indication of such poisoning.”|
|24) Student Deaths Lead Chinese Schools to Change Mask Rules, that’s, 2020||“During the month of April, three cases of students suffering sudden cardiac death (SCD) while running during gym class have been reported in Zhejiang, Henan and Hunan provinces. Beijing Evening News noted that all three students were wearing masks at the time of their deaths, igniting a critical discussion over school rules on when students should wear masks.”|
|25) Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy, 2020||“As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “ None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”1 Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission.”|
|26) The mask requirement is responsible for severe psychological damage and the weakening of the immune system, Coronoa Transition, 2020||“In fact, the mask has the potential to “trigger strong psychovegetative stress reactions via emerging aggression, which correlate significantly with the degree of stressful after-effects”.|
Prousa is not alone in her opinion. Several psychologists dealt with the mask problem — and most came to devastating results. Ignoring them would be fatal, according to Prousa.”
|27) The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease, Kao, 2004||“Wearing an N95 mask for 4 hours during HD significantly reduced PaO2 and increased respiratory adverse effects in ESRD patients.”|
|28) Is a Mask That Covers the Mouth and Nose Free from Undesirable Side Effects in Everyday Use and Free of Potential Hazards?, Kisielinski, 2021||“We objectified evaluation evidenced changes in respiratory physiology of mask wearers with significant correlation of O2 drop and fatigue (p < 0.05), a clustered co-occurrence of respiratory impairment and O2 drop (67%), N95 mask and CO2 rise (82%), N95 mask and O2 drop (72%), N95 mask and headache (60%), respiratory impairment and temperature rise (88%), but also temperature rise and moisture (100%) under the masks. Extended mask-wearing by the general population could lead to relevant effects and consequences in many medical fields.”“Here are the pathophysiological changes and subjective complaints: 1) Increase in blood carbon dioxide 2) Increase in breathing resistance 3) Decrease in blood oxygen saturation 4) Increase in heart rate 5) Decrease in cardiopulmonary capacity 6) Feeling of exhaustion 7) Increase in respiratory rate 8) Difficulty breathing and shortness of breath 9) Headache 10) Dizziness 11) Feeling of dampness and heat 12) Drowsiness (qualitative neurological deficits) 13) Decrease in empathy perception 14) Impaired skin barrier function with acne, itching and skin lesions”|
|29) Is N95 face mask linked to dizziness and headache?, Ipek, 2021||“Respiratory alkalosis and hypocarbia were detected after the use of N95. Acute respiratory alkalosis can cause headache, anxiety, tremor, muscle cramps. In this study, it was quantitatively shown that the participants’ symptoms were due to respiratory alkalosis and hypocarbia.”|
|30) COVID-19 prompts a team of engineers to rethink the humble face mask, Myers, 2020||“But in filtering those particles, the mask also makes it harder to breathe. N95 masks are estimated to reduce oxygen intake by anywhere from 5 to 20 percent. That’s significant, even for a healthy person. It can cause dizziness and lightheadedness. If you wear a mask long enough, it can damage the lungs. For a patient in respiratory distress, it can even be life threatening.”|
|31) 70 doctors in open letter to Ben Weyts: ‘Abolish mandatory mouth mask at school’ – Belgium, World Today News, 2020||“In an open letter to the Flemish Minister of Education Ben Weyts (N-VA), 70 doctors ask to abolish the mandatory mouth mask at school, both for the teachers and for the students. Weyts does not intend to change course. The doctors ask that Minister Ben Weyts immediately reverses his working method: no mouth mask obligation at school, only protect the risk group and only the advice that people with a possible risk profile should consult their doctor.”|
|32) Face masks pose dangers for babies, toddlers during COVID-19 pandemic, UC Davis Health, 2020||“Masks may present a choking hazard for young children. Also, depending on the mask and the fit, the child may have trouble breathing. If this happens, they need to be able to take it off,” said UC Davis pediatrician Lena van der List. “Children less than 2 years of age will not reliably be able to remove a face mask and could suffocate. Therefore, masks should not routinely be used for young children…“The younger the child, the more likely they will be to not wear the mask properly, reach under the mask and touch potentially contaminated masks,” said Dean Blumberg, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at UC Davis Children’s Hospital. “Of course, this depends on the developmental level of the individual child. But I think masks are not likely to provide much potential benefit over risk until the teen years.”|
|33) Covid-19: Important potential side effects of wearing face masks that we should bear in mind, Lazzarino, 2020||“Other potential side effects that we must consider, however, are 1) The quality and volume of speech between people wearing masks is considerably compromised and they may unconsciously come closer2) Wearing a mask makes the exhaled air go into the eyes. This generates an impulse to touch the eyes. 3) If your hands are contaminated, you are infecting yourself, 4) Face masks make breathing more difficult. Moreover, a fraction of carbon dioxide previously exhaled is inhaled at each respiratory cycle. Those phenomena increase breathing frequency and deepness, and they may worsen the burden of covid-19 if infected people wearing masks spread more contaminated air. This may also worsen the clinical condition of infected people if the enhanced breathing pushes the viral load down into their lungs, 5) The innate immunity’s efficacy is highly dependent on the viral load. If masks determine a humid habitat where SARS-CoV-2 can remain active because of the water vapour continuously provided by breathing and captured by the mask fabric, they determine an increase in viral load (by re-inhaling exhaled viruses) and therefore they can cause a defeat of the innate immunity and an increase in infections.”|
|34) Risks of N95 Face Mask Use in Subjects With COPD, Kyung, 2020||“Of the 97 subjects, 7 with COPD did not wear the N95 for the entire test duration. This mask-failure group showed higher British modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale scores and lower FEV1 percent of predicted values than did the successful mask use group. A modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score ≥ 3 (odds ratio 167, 95% CI 8.4 to >999.9; P = .008) or a FEV1 < 30% predicted (odds ratio 163, 95% CI 7.4 to >999.9; P = .001) was associated with a risk of failure to wear the N95. Breathing frequency, blood oxygen saturation, and exhaled carbon dioxide levels also showed significant differences before and after N95 use.”|
|35) Masks too dangerous for children under 2, medical group warns, The Japan Times, 2020||“Children under the age of 2 shouldn’t wear masks because they can make breathing difficult and increase the risk of choking, a medical group has said, launching an urgent appeal to parents as the nation reopens from the coronavirus crisis…Masks can make breathing difficult because infants have narrow air passages,” which increases the burden on their hearts, the association said, adding that masks also raise the risk of heat stroke for them.”|
|36) Face masks can be problematic, dangerous to health of some Canadians: advocates, Spenser, 2020||“Face masks are dangerous to the health of some Canadians and problematic for some others…Asthma Canada president and CEO Vanessa Foran said simply wearing a mask could create risk of an asthma attack.”|
|37) COVID-19 Masks Are a Crime Against Humanity and Child Abuse, Griesz-Brisson, 2020||“The rebreathing of our exhaled air will without a doubt create oxygen deficiency and a flooding of carbon dioxide. We know that the human brain is very sensitive to oxygen depravation. There are nerve cells for example in the hippocampus, that can’t be longer than 3 minutes without oxygen – they cannot survive. The acute warning symptoms are headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, issues in concentration, slowing down of the reaction time – reactions of the cognitive system. However, when you have chronic oxygen depravation, all of those symptoms disappear, because you get used to it. But your efficiency will remain impaired and the undersupply of oxygen in your brain continues to progress. We know that neurodegenerative diseases take years to decades to develop. If today you forget your phone number, the breakdown in your brain would have already started 20 or 30 years ago…The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function. We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Conscious and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication.”|
|38) Study shows how masks are harming children, Mercola, 2021||“Data from the first registry to record children’s experiences with masks show physical, psychological and behavioral issues including irritability, difficulty concentrating and impaired learning.Since school shutdowns in spring 2020, an increasing number of parents are seeking drug treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for their children.Evidence from the U.K. shows schools are not the super spreaders health officials said they were; measured rates of infection in schools were the same as the community, not higher.A large randomized controlled trial showed wearing masks does not reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2.”|
|39) New Study Finds Masks Hurt Schoolchildren Physically, Psychologically, and Behaviorally, Hall, 2021|
|“A new study, involving over 25,000 school-aged children, shows that masks are harming schoolchildren physically, psychologically, and behaviorally, revealing 24 distinct health issues associated with wearing masks…Though these results are concerning, the study also found that 29.7% of children experienced shortness of breath, 26.4% experienced dizziness, and hundreds of the participants experiencing accelerated respiration, tightness in chest, weakness, and short-term impairment of consciousness.”|
|40) Protective Face Masks: Effect on the Oxygenation and Heart Rate Status of Oral Surgeons during Surgery, Scarano, 2021||“In all 20 surgeons wearing FFP2 covered by surgical masks, a reduction in arterial O2 saturation from around 97.5% before surgery to 94% after surgery was recorded with increase of heart rates. A shortness of breath and light-headedness/headaches were also noted.”|
|41) Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity, Fikenzer, 2020||“Ventilation, cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and comfort are reduced by surgical masks and highly impaired by FFP2/N95 face masks in healthy individuals. These data are important for recommendations on wearing face masks at work or during physical exercise.”|
|42) Headaches Associated With Personal Protective Equipment – A Cross-Sectional Study Among Frontline Healthcare Workers During COVID-19, Ong, 2020||“Most healthcare workers develop de novo PPE-associated headaches or exacerbation of their pre-existing headache disorders.”|
|43) Open letter from medical doctors and health professionals to all Belgian authorities and all Belgian media, The American Institute of Stress, 2020||“Wearing a mask is not without side effects. Oxygen deficiency (headache, nausea, fatigue, loss of concentration) occurs fairly quickly, an effect similar to altitude sickness. Every day we now see patients complaining of headaches, sinus problems, respiratory problems, and hyperventilation due to wearing masks. In addition, the accumulated CO2 leads to a toxic acidification of the organism which affects our immunity. Some experts even warn of increased transmission of the virus in case of inappropriate use of the mask.”|
|44) Reusing masks may increase your risk of coronavirus infection, expert says, Laguipo, 2020||“For the public, they should not wear facemasks unless they are sick, and if a healthcare worker advised them.”For the average member of the public walking down a street, it is not a good idea,” Dr. Harries said.”What tends to happen is people will have one mask. They won’t wear it all the time, they will take it off when they get home, they will put it down on a surface they haven’t cleaned,” she added.Further, she added that behavioral issues could adversely put themselves at more risk of getting the infection. For instance, people go out and don’t wash their hands, they touch parts of the mask or their face, and they get infected.”|
|45) What’s Going On Under the Masks?, Wright, 2021||“Americans today have pretty good chompers on average, at least relative to most other people, past and present. Nevertheless, we do not think enough about oral health as evidenced by the almost complete lack of discussion regarding the effect of lockdowns and mandatory masking on our mouths.”|
|46) Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy ChildrenA Randomized Clinical Trial, Walach, 2021||“A large-scale survey in Germany of adverse effects in parents and children using data of 25 930 children has shown that 68% of the participating children had problems when wearing nose and mouth coverings.”|
|47) NM Kids forced to wear masks while running in 100-degree heat; Parents are striking back, Smith, 2021||“Nationally, children have a 99.997% survival rate from COVID-19. In New Mexico, only 0.7% of child COVID-19 cases have resulted in hospitalization. It is clear that children have an extremely low risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19, and mask mandates are placing a burden upon kids which is detrimental to their own health and well-being.”|
|48) Health Canada issues advisory for disposable masks with graphene, CBC, 2021||“Health Canada is advising Canadians not to use disposable face masks that contain graphene. Health Canada issued the notice on Friday and said wearers could inhale graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms. Masks containing the toxic particles may have been distributed in some health-care facilities.”|
|49) COVID-19: Performance study of microplastic inhalation risk posed by wearing masks, Li, 2021|
Is graphene safe?
|“Wearing masks considerably reduces the inhalation risk of particles (e.g., granular microplastics and unknown particles) even when they are worn continuously for 720 h. Surgical, cotton, fashion, and activated carbon masks wearing pose higher fiber-like microplastic inhalation risk, while all masks generally reduced exposure when used under their supposed time (<4 h). N95 poses less fiber-like microplastic inhalation risk. Reusing masks after they underwent different disinfection pre-treatment processes can increase the risk of particle (e.g., granular microplastics) and fiber-like microplastic inhalation. Ultraviolet disinfection exerts a relatively weak effect on fiber-like microplastic inhalation, and thus, it can be recommended as a treatment process for reusing masks if proven effective from microbiological standpoint. Wearing an N95 mask reduces the inhalation risk of spherical-type microplastics by 25.5 times compared with not wearing a mask.”|
|50) Manufacturers have been using nanotechnology-derived graphene in face masks — now there are safety concerns, Maynard, 2021||“Early concerns around graphene were sparked by previous research on another form of carbon — carbon nanotubes. It turns out that some forms of these fiber-like materials can cause serious harm if inhaled. And following on from research here, a natural next-question to ask is whether carbon nanotubes’ close cousin graphene comes with similar concerns.Because graphene lacks many of the physical and chemical aspects of carbon nanotubes that make them harmful (such as being long, thin, and hard for the body to get rid of), the indications are that the material is safer than its nanotube cousins. But safer doesn’t mean safe. And current research indicates that this is not a material that should be used where it could potentially be inhaled, without a good amount of safety testing first…As a general rule of thumb, engineered nanomaterials should not be used in products where they might inadvertently be inhaled and reach the sensitive lower regions of the lungs.”|
|51) Masking young children in school harms language acquisition, Walsh, 2021||“This is important because children and/or students do not have the speech or language ability that adults have — they are not equally able and the ability to see the face and especially the mouth is critical to language acquisition which children and/or students are engaged in at all times. Furthermore, the ability to see the mouth is not only essential to communication but also essential to brain development.“Studies show that by age four, kids from low-income households will hear 30 million less words than their more affluent counterparts, who get more quality face-time with caretakers.” (https://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/november/language-toddlers-fernald-110514.html).”|
|52) Dangerous pathogens found on children’s face masks, Rational Ground, 2021||“A group of parents in Gainesville, FL, sent 6 face masks to a lab at the University of Florida, requesting an analysis of contaminants found on the masks after they had been worn. The resulting report found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria. Although the test is capable of detecting viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, only one virus was found on one mask (alcelaphine herpesvirus 1)…Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more.”|
|53) Face mask dermatitis” due to compulsory facial masks during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: data from 550 health care and non-health care workers in Germany, Niesert, 2021||“The duration of wearing masks showed a significant impact on the prevalence of symptoms (p < 0.001). Type IV hypersensitivity was significantly more likely in participants with symptoms compared to those without symptoms (p = 0.001), whereas no increase in symptoms was observed in participants with atopic diathesis. HCWs used facial skin care products significantly more often than non-HCWs (p = 0.001).”|
|54) Effect of Wearing Face Masks on the Carbon Dioxide Concentration in the Breathing Zone, AAQR/Geiss, 2020||“Detected carbon dioxide concentrations ranged from 2150 ± 192 to 2875 ± 323 ppm. The concentrations of carbon dioxide while not wearing a face mask varied from 500–900 ppm. Doing office work and standing still on the treadmill each resulted in carbon dioxide concentrations of around 2200 ppm. A small increase could be observed when walking at a speed of 3 km h–1 (leisurely walking pace)…concentrations in the detected range can cause undesirable symptoms, such as fatigue, headache, and loss of concentration.”|
|55) Surgical masks as source of bacterial contamination during operative procedures, Zhiqing, 2018||“The source of bacterial contamination in SMs was the body surface of the surgeons rather than the OR environment. Moreover, we recommend that surgeons should change the mask after each operation, especially those beyond 2 hours.”|
|56) The Damage of Masking Children Could be Irreparable, Hussey, 2021||“When we surround children with mask-wearers for a year at a time, are we impairing their face barcode recognition during a period of hot neural development, thus putting full development of the FFA at risk? Does the demand for separation from others, reducing social interaction, add to the potential consequences as it might in autism? When can we be sure that we won’t interfere with visual input to the face recognition visual neurology so we don’t interfere with brain development? How much time with stimulus interference can we allow without consequences? Those are all questions currently without answers; we don’t know. Unfortunately, the science implies that if we mess up brain development for faces, we may not currently have therapies to undo everything we’ve done.”|
|57) Masks can be Murder, Grossman, 2021||“Wearing masks can create a sense of anonymity for an aggressor, while also dehumanizing the victim. This prevents empathy, empowering violence, and murder.” Masking helps remove empathy and compassion, allowing others to commit unspeakable acts on the masked person.”|
|58) London high school teacher calls face masks an ‘egregious and unforgivable form of child abuse, Butler, 2020||“In his email, Farquharson called the campaign to legislate mask wearing a “shameful farce, a charade, an act of political theatre” that’s more about enforcing “obedience and compliance” than it is about public health. He also likened children wearing masks to “involuntary self-torture,” calling it “an egregious and unforgivable form of child abuse and physical assault.”|
|59) UK Government Advisor Admits Masks Are Just “Comfort Blankets” That Do Virtually Nothing, ZeroHedge, 2021||“As the UK Government heralds “freedom day” today, which is anything but, a prominent government scientific advisor has admitted that face masks do very little to protect from coronavirus and are basically just “comfort blankets…the professor noted that “those aerosols escape masks and will render the mask ineffective,” adding “The public were demanding something must be done, they got masks, it is just a comfort blanket. But now it is entrenched, and we are entrenching bad behaviour…all around the world you can look at mask mandates and superimpose on infection rates, you cannot see that mask mandates made any effect whatsoever,” Axon further noted, adding that “The best thing you can say about any mask is that any positive effect they do have is too small to be measured.”|
|60) Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 1: Friable mask particulate and lung vulnerability, Borovoy, 2020||“Surgical personnel are trained to never touch any part of a mask, except the loops and the nose bridge. Otherwise, the mask is considered useless and is to be replaced. Surgical personnel are strictly trained not to touch their masks otherwise. However, the general public may be seen touching various parts of their masks. Even the masks just removed from manufacturer packaging have been shown in the above photos to contain particulate and fiber that would not be optimal to inhale… Further concerns of macrophage response and other immune and inflammatory and fibroblast response to such inhaled particles specifically from facemasks should be the subject of more research. If widespread masking continues, then the potential for inhaling mask fibers and environmental and biological debris continues on a daily basis for hundreds of millions of people. This should be alarming for physicians and epidemiologists knowledgeable in occupational hazards.”|
|61) Medical Masks, Desai, 2020||“Face masks should be used only by individuals who have symptoms of respiratory infection such as coughing, sneezing, or, in some cases, fever. Face masks should also be worn by health care workers, by individuals who are taking care of or are in close contact with people who have respiratory infections, or otherwise as directed by a doctor. Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.”|
- Paul Elias AlexanderDr Alexander holds a PhD. He has experience in epidemiology and in the teaching clinical epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, and research methodology. Dr Alexander is a former Assistant Professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine and research methods; former COVID Pandemic evidence-synthesis consultant advisor to WHO-PAHO Washington, DC (2020) and former senior advisor to COVID Pandemic policy in Health and Human Services (HHS) Washington, DC (A Secretary), US government; worked/appointed in 2008 at WHO as a regional specialist/epidemiologist in Europe’s Regional office Denmark, worked for the government of Canada as an epidemiologist for 12 years, appointed as the Canadian in-field epidemiologist (2002-2004) as part of an international CIDA funded, Health Canada executed project on TB/HIV co-infection and MDR-TB control (involving India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Afghanistan, posted to Kathmandu); employed from 2017 to 2019 at Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Virginia USA as the evidence synthesis meta-analysis systematic review guideline development trainer; currently a COVID-19 consultant researcher in the US-C19 research group
Strengthen my faith, Lord. Forgive my sins, so that I may be clean in your righteousness.
Make me brave, so I can stand and fight the spiritual battles in my life and in our world. Give me your wisdom and discernment so I won’t be caught off guard.
Together, Lord, we’ll win, because in truth, you already have. While evil still roams, the power of Your name and Your blood rises up to defeat and bring us victory against every evil planned against us. While malicious actions may disturb us, we use the armor of God You have given us to stand firm.
You will bring justice in due time for all the harm and needless violence aimed at Your children. Until then, we remain in Your presence, aligned with Your purposes, and we look to You as our Supreme Commander and Protector.
Help us to avoid temptation, and deliver us from evil, Lord. You are the Mighty One, the One Who will ultimately bring all evil to light. With You, Jesus, we are safe. Amen.
Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc. Please like our videos and subscribe to our channel. Thanks
Read More here https://aviationnewz.com/usa-airline-pilot-deaths-up-by-1750-since-convid-jab-started/
USA Airline Pilot Deaths up by 1,750% Since Convid Jab Started
This entry was posted by aviator on December 17, 2021 at 10:29 am
USA Airline Pilot Deaths up by 1,750% Since Convid Jab Started
USA Airline Pilot Deaths up by 1,750% Since Convid Jab Started
Previously healthy U.S. airline pilots are passing away at an unprecedented rate. Pilots are required to be in tip-top physical condition, but in 2021, the entire airline industry conspired against the pilot’s individual health and threatened them with termination if they did not partake in the covid-19 vaccine experiment. As a result, over one hundred young pilots have mysteriously passed away in 2021, as countless other pilots suffer silently from adverse events and depleted immune systems.
A total of one hundred eleven pilots died in the first eight months of this year! This is a 1,750% increase from 2020, when the world was supposed to be in the middle of a pandemic. A list of the deceased individuals was published in the Air Line Pilot Association magazine. In comparison, there were 6 airline pilot deaths in 2020, and only one death in 2019.
Tsunami of pilot deaths is a warning to everyone
Most of the 111 deaths occurred after the covid-19 jabs were rolled out en masse. Because there are no medical codes for vaccine-induced death, most of the deaths are blamed on other causes. These causes may be related to the pathological evidence behind vaccine injuries, but are never coded as such. Pathological evidence is often ignored, and the deaths of young men and women are often referred to as “sudden” or “unexplained” – with no pathological investigation.
Only 5 deaths were recorded from January-March in 2021, when vaccine uptake was low. Peculiarly, a total of (39) deaths occurred in July and (34) occurred in August — right after governments and private companies used vaccine mandates to violate the privacy of their employees and punish them. Even though these intimidation tactics are illegal, these vaccine mandates were used to scare pilots into submission. Like in many professional fields, pilots went against their own beliefs and against their private medical situation, accepting the subjugation. Many complied with the vaccine mandates because the discrimination was so strong, equal opportunities were being shuttered and personal health decisions were not being honored. Many were afraid to lose their job and their future career prospects, so they lined up, hoping for the best while justifying the medical tyranny.
Deadly vaccine issues have been pushed aside for decades, as the world wakes up to the industry’s hidden horrors
Young, previously healthy athletes are seeing the same trend in mortality as the pilots are. Goodsciencing.com tracked over 300 post-vaccine medical incidents from January 1 to December 10. These incidents involved young, previously healthy athletes who suddenly collapsed on the playing field in 2021. Out of these unexplained medical incidents, 170 of the athletes ended up dead. These trends are not surprising, because pharmacovigilance data collected around the world shows that the mRNA vaccines are causing heart inflammation, autoimmune issues, and immune depletion, leading to sudden cardiac arrest, neurological dysfunction and severe infections. CovidVaccineVictims.com retains a memorial for people who passed away as a result of this horrendously forceful, ghastly genetic experiment.
The issues with vaccination have been brushed aside for decades, ever since the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act granted legal protections for vaccine companies in the United States. Enjoying legal immunity for over thirty years, vaccine makers made a mockery of the rule of law, exempting themselves from legal accountability when their products harm people. Today, mRNA vaccine makers have entered into contracts with governments around the world to exempt their operations from any judicial responsibility or a jury trial. Vaccine makers are operating above the law and will continue to get away with genocide if the rule of law is not restored. The mRNA vaccine makers have plans for endless boosters now. Their dominion over governments and their endless money supply will allow them to steal, kill and destroy using propaganda, coercion and force.
A MUST READ!
In his new book, titled “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health,” Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. stripped the mask off the monster to reveal the diabolical true measure of the man. Since at least the 1980s, he prioritized Pharma profits — along with self-enrichment and […]The True Measure of More Monster Than Man Fauci — The Stephen Lendman Blog — Truth2Freedom’s Blog