U.S. government secretly using flu shot to seize control of EVERY AMERICAN’S immune system

Mercury
(Image: U.S. government secretly using flu shot to seize control of EVERY AMERICAN’S immune system)

U.S. government secretly using flu shot to seize control of EVERY AMERICAN’S immune system
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-20-government-using-flu-shot-to-control-your-immune-system.html
Sunday, October 20, 2019 by: S.D. Wells

(Natural News) The vaccine industry always says “the science is settled” when it comes to any concoction they slap together and call a “vaccine.” The science isn’t “settled” because it’s never settled. You can’t predict the future, and organic and genetically modified things can quickly morph and mutate, changing everything. There’s a quote on vaccine research we must share, and it comes from the vaccine industry themselves, via the CDC, informing everyone they’ve got all the ingredients in vaccines already figured out, and that nobody should ever question, research, test or deny the “settled science” of any vaccine ever again.

Before we get to that crazy quote, realize there is still a significant amount of mercury in flu shots. No, the CDC didn’t remove it back in 2003, like they said. They lied. And, few people know, the same industry that just shelled out $4 billion dollars in compensation through their secretive court for the vaccine-damaged families, also shelled out $3 billion of that $4 billion for the… wait for it…. damage the flu shot inflicted. So here we go with the quote: “Despite a lack of good-quality evidence, we do not recommend that any further research on this topic is undertaken.” (regarding vaccines that contain aluminum).

The CDC doesn’t mention the “neurotoxic and cancer-causing agents” (per Dr. John Bergman from embedded video below), they just talk about trying to get the strains of flu right in their “wild” guess for each “flu season” – which is listed by the CDC as being October through May – yes, that means virtually three quarters of the entire year is “flu season” according to and CDC and the U.S. Government.

Warning: There have been NO controlled trials done for the flu shot, at all

They admit it right on the vaccine insert and warning label, that nobody seems to ever read: “There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination.” Huh?

There’s absolutely no way anyone should get the flu shot after reading this. There’s no good “trade off” to avoid the flu if the shot doesn’t even work and you’re getting injected with mercury that can cause dementia, especially at 25,000 times more per dose than the EPA warns about in fish. Oops. In fact, there are 25 micrograms in one average flu vaccine, and the EPA safety limit is 5 micrograms, so children who are vaccinated simultaneously with multiple vaccines can receive over 10 times the safety limit of mercury in one day.

It’s not just about the mercury either. You’re also dealing with MSG, formaldehyde, cancer cells and toxic heavy metals poisoning. It just gets worse. It’s all about mind control. You drink tap water with fluoride that lowers your IQ. Then you get injected with the world’s most lethal non-radioactive substance known to man. Then you watch TV and read the newspaper and voila, you think socialism might just work. Wake up. The U.S. government is secretly using flu shots to seize control of every American’s immune system.
Flu shots are nothing but quack science and a horrible medical hoax that rakes in billions in profit, far more than they pay out for damages

Don’t jump to conclusions so fast. Vaccines aren’t quack science. Some can confer immunization effectiveness, but not the influenza vaccine. The flu shot weakens your immunity for the following years, and that’s why they tell you not to get another one if you’ve ever received one before.

Then, when they guess the wrong viral strains, the “vaxxed” people are shedding and spreading strains that aren’t even in the wild or from the wild, but manufactured in laboratories using genetic engineering.

There are no double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for this. Every single method of modern flu vaccination CAUSES viral strains to mutate, so the immunity they claim you might get is not even conferred. Get it? You can’t get protection from the wild virus when what you got injected into your muscle tissue was manufactured, mutated, and loaded with mercury.

The science is never “settled.” Then it wouldn’t be science. Heck, the second you think you’ve got something figured out for good, it will change on you, maybe even blow your hypothesis to bits. Remember back when they thought the world was flat? How about when they thought the sun revolved around the Earth? And remember when people thought Pluto was a planet? Wasn’t that science “settled” then? Or, remember way back when they thought the world was getting hotter too fast? Wait, that’s now.

Folks, the theory that flu shots work has been blown to bits, plus it’s loaded with chemicals that impair cognitive function AND immune function. It’s a lose, lose situation folks, and the less you can think for yourself, and the sicker you get, the better chance Big Government will take away every right you’re taking for granted right now.

Think for a second about this – how many people have died from the flu AFTER getting the flu shot? Take a real close look at that.

The flu shot is a hoax. It’s deadly too. Yes, this is happening, this year. Watch this complete analysis of the entire vaccine hoax, by the brilliant Dr. John Bergman:

Tune in to Vaccines.news for updates on how vaccines are the problem, not the solution.

Don’t You Take Anything That Big Pharma Isn’t Making Money On. Next they will be putting people into jail for using homeopathic medications.


(Chamille White/Shutterstock.com)

FDA Is Taking a More Aggressive Stance Toward Homeopathic Drugs
https://www.sciencealert.com/fda-takes-more-aggressive-stance-toward-homeopathic-drugs?perpetual=yes&limitstart=1

“Just silly from a scientific point of view.”
LAURIE MCGINLEY, THE WASHINGTON POST
19 DEC 2017

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Monday proposed a tougher enforcement policy toward homeopathic drugs, saying it would target products posing the greatest safety risks, including those containing potentially harmful ingredients or being marketed for cancer, heart disease and opioid and alcohol addictions.

Homeopathy is based on an 18th-century idea that substances that cause disease symptoms can, in very small doses, cure the same symptoms.

Modern medicine, backed up by numerous studies, has disproved the central tenets of homeopathy and shown that the products are worthless at best and harmful at worst.

Under US law, homeopathic drugs are required to meet the same approval rules as other drugs. But under a policy adopted in 1988, the agency has used “enforcement discretion” to allow the items to be manufactured and distributed without FDA approval.

Agency officials don’t plan to begin requiring that homeopathic products get approval – officials say that would be impractical – but they are signalling stepped-up scrutiny for items deemed a possible health threat.

Examples of high-risk products include ones that are administered by injection, are intended for vulnerable populations like children or the elderly, or are marketed for serious diseases, the agency said.

The FDA’s proposed approach, outlined in a draft guidance that will be open for public for 90 days, comes more than a year after homeopathic teething tablets and gels containing belladonna were linked to 400 injuries and the deaths of 10 children.

An FDA lab analysis later confirmed that some of the products “contained elevated and inconsistent levels of belladonna”, a toxic substance, the agency said.

Once a niche field, homeopathy has grown into to a US$3 billion industry that peddles treatments for everything from cancer to colds, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb noted in a statement.

“In many cases, people may be placing their trust and money in therapies that may bring little or no benefit in combating serious ailments, or worse – that may cause significant and even irreparable harm” because of poor manufacturing quality or unsafe ingredients, he said.

Still, he said, the agency wants to balance its safety concerns with the desires of consumers who want to continue using the products.

Under its planned approach, many products won’t be considered high risk and will remain available to consumers, Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, told reporters during a teleconference.

But she said, the agency would “go after” products that cause – or might cause – “overt harm”.

The National Center for Homeopathy, which advocates for homeopathy and is based in Mount Laurel, NJ, says on its website that “homeopathy is a safe, gentle, and natural system of healing that works with your body to relieve symptoms, restore itself, and improve your overall health.”

Steven Salzberg, a biomedical engineer at Johns Hopkins University who in the past has criticised the FDA for not taking action against homeopathy, said it was “terrific” that the agency now plans to try to rein in the industry.

He cautioned that product makers are likely to “hit back hard with lots of spurious claims in an effort to confuse consumers and to protect their profits.”

Salzberg added that homeopathic products’ packaging suggests that the items “cure all sorts of conditions – pain, colds, asthma, indigestion, arthritis, you name it – and yet there’s not a whit of evidence” that they cure anything.

The homeopathy field, he said, is “just silly from a scientific point of view, more like a religious belief than a scientific belief.”

In July, Britain’s National Health System announced plans to stop doctors from prescribing homeopathic drugs. Simon Stevens, the system’s chief executive, described homeopathy as “at best a placebo and a misuse of scarce NHS funds”.

The move came years after the House of Commons called on the government health service to stop paying for homeopathic prescriptions, saying, “To maintain patient trust, choice and safety, the Government should not endorse the use of placebo treatments, including homeopathy.”

In April 2015, the FDA held public hearings on the way it regulates homeopathic products as part of an effort to get public input on its enforcement polices.

The agency said Monday that as a result of the hearing and 9,000 comments submitted by the public, the FDA had decided to propose a new “comprehensive, risk-based enforcement approach to drug products labelled as homeopathic and marketed without FDA approval.”

Over the past several years, the FDA has issued warnings about other homeopathic drug products, including zinc-containing intranasal products that may cause a loss of sense of smell; certain homeopathic asthma products that have not been effective in treating asthma and other products that contain strychnine, a poison used to kill rodents.

2017 © The Washington Post

This article was originally published by The Washington Post.

URGENT: CDC Attempts Unconstitutional “Power Grab”

By Ty Bollinger
21,791 Total Views
CDC-vaccination

On August 15th, 2016, in an unbelievably draconian attempt to claim control over YOUR body, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued “Control of Communicable Diseases – Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” (published in Federal Register Number: 2016-18103).

Ebola-Treatment-Options-Sierra-Leone-665x385

If you have the patience to wade through the linguistic gibberish, legal mumbo jumbo, and medical doublespeak, you’ll see that this proposed rule would give the CDC the power to apprehend, detain, and vaccinate YOU against your will and without your consent!

I’m sorry, did we stumble into Mao’s China? Or Hitler’s Germany? Is this a decree from Kim Jong-un? Although this sounds like something we would expect from Communist China, Nazi Germany, or current day North Korea, the proposed rule is intended for “the land of the free and the home of the brave.”

If you read between the lines, you’ll see that if this goes into effect, anyone in the USA who is “suspected” of carrying a communicable disease can be detained, quarantined, and “medically treated” (i.e. forcibly vaccinated). All under the guise of “protecting” us from some new strain of virus (like Zika) or some phony pandemic (like Ebola or West Nile or Swine Flu).
[url=https://postimg.org/image/g6gjbp7bf/][img]https://s25.postimg.org/g6gjbp7bf/CDC.png[/img][/url]
CDC As Robert Scott Bell often mentions – vaccines are the sacred cow of the “Church of Pharmaceutical Mysticism.” Despite the fact that most of the recent “outbreaks” have been in almost fully vaccinated areas, like the current mumps outbreak in Arkansas where 100% of the cases are in vaccinated individuals, the CDC still propagates the lie that these neurotoxic injections (which have been linked to cancer) are “safe and effective.”

By the way, this directly contradicts the findings of the kangaroo court system set up by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program which has paid out $3.4 BILLION to vaccine injured families, so I guess they aren’t all that “safe.”

But that’s not even the focus of this article. I’m trying to sound the alarm that this is an attempted authoritarian power grab of unprecedented proportions! Regardless of your opinion about vaccines, the real issue is whether the U.S. government has the right to force any medical intervention upon its citizens.

The real question at hand is “who owns your body?” This proposed rule is a blatant declaration that the U.S. government (and CDC) own your body. I guess they don’t believe that each individual has certain inalienable rights that cannot be disregarded or abandoned.

vaccines-cdc-proposed-rule-2
postimage

Has the CDC ever heard of informed consent? You know, our right to decide whether or not we agree to a medical procedure based upon being given all the facts? A frightening portion of this proposed rule states “the individual’s consent shall not be considered as a prerequisite to any exercise of any authority under this part.” In other words, the CDC can force any medical treatment that they deem to be appropriate, and it doesn’t matter one iota whether you consent or not.

In my opinion, the CDC is attempting to create a “medical fascist police state” which trashes the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights and where citizens are no safer than the Jews in Nazi Germany’s concentration camps. You see, the Nazis claimed ownership over Jewish people’s bodies and eventually rounded them up and took them to the death camps, where many of them were forcibly vaccinated and eventually murdered.

Nazi-Jews

postimage

If this totalitarian, tyrannical proposed rule becomes law, you can literally kiss your freedom goodbye. If you value your life, your freedom, and your health, and if you are concerned about the future of your children and grandchildren, please make your voice heard.

Don’t be a sheep. In 1787, Thomas Jefferson, writing from Paris in a letter to Edward Carrington, said that a nation of sheep would result in a government of wolves.

Let’s join together and let the wolves of the CDC know, in no uncertain terms, that we won’t take this any longer and that this nefarious proposed power grab is not acceptable.

Please file your comments at this website before October 14, 2016. At this link, click the green button near the top right that says “Submit a Formal Comment” and express your concern / disapproval / outrage over this proposal.


CDC exposed as private corporation colluding with Big Pharma to defraud American taxpayers: see the evidence
Submitted by IWB, on December 3rd, 2015
http://investmentwatchblog.com/cdc-exposed-as-private-corporation-colluding-with-big-pharma-to-defraud-american-taxpayers-see-the-evidence/

1
by: Ethan A. Huff

CDC corruption

(NaturalNews) The illusory notion that the federal regulatory agency known as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is somehow a public entity working on behalf of the people to protect us all from disease is simply laughable.

The CDC, by definition, is a private corporation working on behalf of its stakeholders, which include key players in the pharmaceutical and vaccine industries that profit from the spread of disease, not from real prevention and cures.

The first and most obvious clue that the CDC isn’t what it appears on the surface is the fact that this supposed government agency is listed in the official Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) directory as a for-profit corporation.

D&B is a Fortune 500 company based in New Jersey that maintains databases on more than 235 million companies worldwide – it’s a who’s who of the global business climate, and is recognized as one of the first companies to be publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).

Here’s a screenshot of the CDC’s listing on D&B, courtesy of the AntiCorruption Society:

Big Pharma and the CDC: one in the same
Anyone who tries to argue with you that the CDC is looking out for public safety as its first priority just needs to take a glance at D&B to see that the CDC is actually looking out for its own bottom line, and that of its corporate allies. Which brings us into our second piece of evidence that the CDC is a corrupt, drug-pandering sham – many of the CDC’s top health “experts” have ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

An investigation by the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ) found that three key “scientists” who helped develop official swine flu policy for the World Health Organization (WHO), recommending that practically everyone be vaccinated, received cash payments from both Roche and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), two pharmaceutical giants that manufacture swine flu vaccines.

These two companies, as reported by The Guardian in 2010, paid off policymakers in multiple countries, including in the U.S. (at the CDC), to write the WHO’s guidelines for swine flu that pushed dangerous swine flu vaccines on millions of people globally. With the help of the CDC and other corrupt agencies, these pharmaceutical corporations pocketed billions of dollars.

“The tentacles of drug company influence are in all levels in the decision-making process,” stated Paul Flynn, a British Member of Parliament who spoke out against this racket as it was occurring.

CDC pushes fake science promoting deadly drugs, vaccines
The CDC has also been complicit in forging fake science to push other dangerous vaccines like the MMR jab for measles, mumps and rubella. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. blew the lid on this scandal that same year, outing now-shamed scientist Poul Thorsen for stealing $2 million in research money while covering up the link between MMR and autism, which the CDC ate right up in its quest to protect the reputation of MMR.

Top CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson has also since come forward as a whistleblowerto expose the CDC for manipulating research findings that showed MMR causes autism at a disproportionately higher rate in young black boys compared to other children – though MMR causes autism in all types of children, this same research found.

“As more and more ‘vaccination’ propaganda appears in the mainstream media, it is crucial that the American people become aware of the outrageous scam the CDC and the medical industrial complex are running,” warns the AntiCorruption Society.

“All that is needed is for folks to educate themselves and join the many good people (professionals and non-professionals) working to get the truth out.”

Sources for this article include:

AntiCorruptionSociety.com

TheGuardian.com

HuffingtonPost.com

NaturalNews.com

ENENews: CIA Agent: “Gov’t covering up effects of radiation; I hope public becomes more aware of threat to their health”

CIA Agent: Gov’t covering up effects of radiation; I hope public becomes more aware of threat to their health — Study: Actual radiation risks are “orders of magnitude greater” than official estimates; “Completely changes the picture… a serious public health hazard” (VIDEO)
Published: June 13th, 2015 at 5:46 pm ET
By ENENews
http://enenews.com/cia-agent-govt-covering-effects-radiation-hope-americans-become-aware-threat-public-health-study-actual-radiation-risks-orders-magnitude-greater-official-estimates-completely-picture-serious-public?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ENENews+%28Energy+News%29

The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine (pdf): http://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC2596024&blobtype=pdf
Direct Estimates of Low-Level Radiation Risks of Lung Cancer at Two NRC-Compliant Nuclear Installations: Why Are the New Risk Estimates 20 to 200 Times the Old Official Estimates?, Dr. Irwin Bross, Director of Biostatistics at Roswell Park Memorial Institute, 1981 (emphasis added):

Nuclear submarine workers at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNS), who were exposed to low-level ionizing radiation [face] serious hazards.

The new risk estimates have been found to be much higher than the official estimates.
CDC/NIOSH refused to retract or correct the conclusion [that] “we found no positive dosage response relationships between ionizing radiation dose and mortality for any cause reported.” [They used] an incompetent way to examine this data.

[Our analysis] gives 189 lung cancer deaths per year per million persons per rem. This is over 100 times the official estimates and completely changes the picture.

PNS workers received much less than the 5 rem per year currently permitted… about 0.5 rem per year. Yet this was enough to greatly increase their risk of lung cancer.

Why does… data for the [Hanford] workers… show no lung cancer relationship? [When experts] analyzed the Hanford data they did find excess lung cancer and a doubling dose… similar to the corresponding estimate for the shipyard workers.

Estimates of risk to nuclear workers are two logarithmic orders of magnitude greater than the official risks. When the actual risks are 100 times greater, the cost-benefit calculations or permissible levels or environmental impact statements based on the official estimates cannot protect the health and safety of workers or the public.

Indeed, there are now more than 30 studies where the data show positive relationships in human populations exposed to low-level ionizing radiation.

Scientific evaluation of radiation risks [should] replace the obsolete older estimates by the newer ones. That this did not happen in the latest BEIR report suggests that official estimates are no longer a scientific product but rather a political one.

Radiation [studies] become bogged down in real or manufactured “controversies”… There is now much more than a prima facie case that NRC permits doses of radiation that are dangerous – a dose that doubles the risk of a fatal disease is a serious public health hazard.

Jay Mullen, former CIA agent and professor at Southern Oregon Univ., Oct 2013 (15:30 in):

When I was 19 years old, I was… a University athlete. I woke up one night and couldn’t move, it paralyzed me… it just baffled doctors… the Univ. of California Medical Center… determined it was the thyroid disorder that was paralyzing me… I had a thyroidectomy and as a consequence I wear what we call the Hanford necklace.

(thyroid anaplastic thyroid carcinoma gross photo)

There’s a good reason if you are an investor in the nuclear community to cover up the pernicious effects of radiation, because there’s profits in nuclear operations… There are strong ‘balance sheet’ reasons to continue the nuclear community, and therefore there’s a reason to discount the possible adverse effects of radiation.

I was in the government, but I was in the government clandestinely. I was an undercover agent for the Central Intelligence Agency in Africa in the 1970s… I understand very well that the government covers up things that might in fact be embarrassing to the government. What could be more embarrassing to the government than the fact that they hazarded their own people by their operations in the atomic community?

I would hope the American public becomes more aware of the effects that radiation can have on the public’s health.

The thing I find most distressing is the dissembling and… the contempt that the government and its contractors have had for the people who they’ve in fact affected.
Watch the interview here:

How Would CDC Know That 3.2 million Americans Have Hepatitis C, That Were Born Between 1945 and 1965? Unless They Gave It To Them…

Email Received from CDC:

Viral Hepatitis Updates from CDC

CDC Releases New Phase of the Know More Hepatitis Campaign
Of the estimated 3.2 million Americans who have Hepatitis C, 3 in 4 are people born from 1945 to 1965. The Know More Hepatitis campaign encourages everyone born from 1945-1965 to follow the CDC recommendation to get tested for Hepatitis C.

The campaign is being implemented using a variety of multi-media channels including print, radio and TV PSAs, as well as airport dioramas, billboards, and transit advertisements. CDC developed additional campaign materials to help educate patients and promote testing for Hepatitis C including a new video PSA “Hepatitis C: A Hidden Disease”which shows that even if you have a healthy life and no symptoms, you could still have Hepatitis C.

Implementing the Viral Hepatitis Action Plan: The Role of Community Leadership
Since the release of the 2014 Action Plan for the Prevention, Care, & Treatment of Viral Hepatitis, groups like Hep B United (HBU) have used it as a framework to help guide their work. HBU utilized the Stakeholders’ Workbook as a starting point to develop a Strategic Plan which highlights HBU members’ areas of focus: community and provider education, improving testing and linkage to care to prevent hepatitis B-related liver disease and cancer, eliminating perinatal transmission of hepatitis B, and strengthening hepatitis B and C surveillance efforts. HBU also developed Opportunities for Federal-Community Collaboration to Reduce Disparities in Hepatitis B: 2014-2016 which highlights ways in which HBU members can collaborate in larger federal inter-agency efforts. https://blog.aids.gov/2015/01/implementing-the-viral-hepatitis-action-plan-the-role-of-community-leadership.html

NIH Announces Funding for New Technologies for Viral Hepatitis
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has issued a funding opportunity announcement (FOA). A Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant entitled New Technologies for Viral Hepatitis SBIR (R43/R44) encourages small businesses to address viral hepatitis research opportunities delineated in the Action Plan including (but not limited to) the development of: rapid screening tests, new diagnostic tests, tests for viral hepatitis-related complications, practical models of care, new and improved therapies to treat viral hepatitis or manage complications of disease or antiviral treatment, genetic-based tests for patient management or treatment selection, preventive vaccines, innovative approaches to pathogen identification and reduction in blood products. https://blog.aids.gov/2015/01/nih-announces-funding-for-new-technologies-for-viral-hepatitis.html

CDC Warning, Just In From CDC “Simulated IV Fluids Continues”

Investigation into Patients Being Injected with Simulated IV Fluids Continues

FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continuing to investigate multiple instances of Wallcur’s simulated intravenous (IV) saline products being administered to patients. These products are NOT sterile and should NOT be injected in humans or animals. FDA has posted an update on the investigation on its website, which may be found at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm428431.htm.

Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

Bookmark and Share

Investigation into Patients Being Injected with Simulated IV Fluids Continues

FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continuing to investigate multiple instances of Wallcur’s simulated intravenous (IV) saline products being administered to patients. These products are NOT sterile and should NOT be injected in humans or animals. FDA has posted an update on the investigation on its website, which may be found at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm428431.htm.
As a reminder, Wallcur’s simulated IV saline solution, Practi-0.9% sodium chloride solution, was shipped to medical clinics, surgical centers, and urgent care facilities in numerous states. So far, more than 40 patients have received infusions of the simulated saline products, and there have been many adverse events associated with these incidents including fever, chills, tremors and headache. Some patients were hospitalized, and there is one death associated with the use of these products; it is not known if this death is directly related to the use of the product. Adverse events have been reported in seven states: Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, North Carolina, New York, and Colorado.

ucm428435

Investigation into Patients Being Injected with Simulated IV Fluids Continues

FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continuing to investigate multiple instances of Wallcur’s simulated intravenous (IV) saline products being administered to patients. These products are NOT sterile and should NOT be injected in humans or animals. FDA has posted an update on the investigation on its website, which may be found at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm428431.htm.
As a reminder, Wallcur’s simulated IV saline solution, Practi-0.9% sodium chloride solution, was shipped to medical clinics, surgical centers, and urgent care facilities in numerous states. So far, more than 40 patients have received infusions of the simulated saline products, and there have been many adverse events associated with these incidents including fever, chills, tremors and headache. Some patients were hospitalized, and there is one death associated with the use of these products; it is not known if this death is directly related to the use of the product. Adverse events have been reported in seven states: Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, North Carolina, New York, and Colorado.

To view the full, updated alert on this important situation, please visit http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm428431.htm.

As a reminder, Wallcur’s simulated IV saline solution, Practi-0.9% sodium chloride solution, was shipped to medical clinics, surgical centers, and urgent care facilities in numerous states. So far, more than 40 patients have received infusions of the simulated saline products, and there have been many adverse events associated with these incidents including fever, chills, tremors and headache. Some patients were hospitalized, and there is one death associated with the use of these products; it is not known if this death is directly related to the use of the product. Adverse events have been reported in seven states: Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, North Carolina, New York, and Colorado.

To view the full, updated alert on this important situation, please visit http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm428431.htm.