California to throw adults in JAIL if they refuse government-mandated vaccines
Monday, August 10, 2015 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: SB792, mandatory vaccines, California
http://www.naturalnews.com/050725_SB792_mandatory_vaccines_California.html
Senate Bill 792, also known as the “Day care facilities: immunizations: exemptions” act, was presented quietly alongside SB 277, which eliminates personal, philosophical and religious vaccine exemptions for children who attend both private and public schools in the Golden State. The bill, as recently heard by the California Assembly Human Services Committee, reads as follows:
This bill, commencing September 1, 2016, would prohibit a day care center or a family day care home from employing any person who has not been immunized against influenza, pertussis, and measles.
If passed, SB 792 would represent the first adult vaccine mandate in the U.S. that disallows exemptions for personal reasons, and that threatens criminal penalties for those who fail or refuse to comply. Here’s how Vaccine Impact describes SB 792:
SB 792, would eliminate an adult’s right to exempt themselves from one, some, or all vaccines, a risk-laden medical procedure.
This bill would make California the first state to require mandated vaccinations for all childcare workers, including all private and public school early childhood education programs (Headstart, Private preK and preschools), family daycares, and daycare centers.
SB 792 represents medical violence against adults
An affront to both medical and religious liberty, SB 792 appears to be the wave of the future in New America, where the perceived health of the “herd” is now more important than the health of the individual. Never before in the history of the United States have legislators pushed this hard to literally force vaccine injections on the public under duress.
But why do they feel the need to do this if vaccines really work and are truly safe as claimed? The answer is that vaccines aren’t safe and effective, and more people than ever are acknowledging this truth and opting out of the “requirements” of the system through vaccine exemptions, hence the rush to eliminate these exemptions as quickly as possible, starting with California.
“This bill eliminates medical autonomy, crushes religious freedom, undermines personal freedom, and burdens quality providers with a non-optional series of medical interventions in the form of mandated vaccines that are not even 100% effective,” adds Vaccine Impact.
Contact California legislators and say NO to SB 792
As of this writing, SB 792 awaits a hearing by California’s Committee on Appropriations, having recently passed through the Assembly Human Services Committee with a 6-1 vote. The official vote tally reveals that the following members of this committee voted in FAVOR of passing SB 792:
Ian C. Calderon
Kansen Chu
Patty Lopez
Brian Maienschein
Mark Stone
Tony Thurmond
You can contact the above individuals here and let them know how you feel about their betrayal of medical freedom in California.
You can also contact the individual members of the Committee on Appropriations and tell them to vote AGAINST SB 792 by visiting: pro.assembly.ca.gov
If Americans sit idly by while corrupt legislators pass incremental bills like SB 277 and SB 792, it will only be a matter of time before even stricter bills come along mandating vaccinations for additional groups of people, until eventually everyone is forced into being vaccinated by the state for the benefit of “public health.”
“Laws like these are forging a burden of responsibility that is collectively shared by everyone,” writes Joshua Krause for GlobalResearch.ca.
“It won’t be long before they try to force vaccines on every adult and child in California. And if they pull it off there, legislators in other states will try to see if they can use the sheepish tyranny of majority rule to force vaccines on their citizens as well.”
Sources:
experimentalvaccines.org
vaccineimpact.com
globalresearch.ca
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
apro.assembly.ca.gov
Some very interesting input there evoldog1234
LikeLiked by 1 person
MORE “FOOD” FOR THOUGHT:
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/07/07/hillary-soon-power-control-food-water/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=hillary-soon-power-control-food-water
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know, all the blustering and “Blow-Holery” really does not help.
I don’t get flu shots, etc., and I understand those who don’t want the govt to tell them what to get shots for – but at the same time, for someone to apply for job at a child care center, or who the fuck cares WHAT other place, and wants to argue about disclosing (and submitting to) whether or not they may have smallpox or some other shit that can be passed on to those in the business looking to hire them, I really don’t think their personal freedoms and choices makes half a good goddamn bit of differnce.
Your free will ends at MY nose – and while you may have the right to not take a shot for this and a shot for that, the same does NOT give you the right to possibly expose others to deadly shit simply because you have the right to expose yourself to it; and claiming that same is somehow an infringement on YOUR personal rights and freedoms its stretching things a BIT.
Actually, it’s a total and complete bullshit defense, and it denigrates all actual PERSONAL defenses against such laws and attempts to make laws that protect people, unenforceable, which is also bullshit.
Are all laws such as you attack here, good and not deserving of review?
Absolutely not – many may be bad – but the premise you attempt to set forth – that no individual should have to succumb to ANY govt or otherwise standard when dealing with the public, is not just nonsense, it is sheer madness – but mostly it makes you look like a complete buffoon for demanding something so fucking and ridiculously stoopid, and accordingly, it makes it next to impossible for any reality based control to take place…but bark on, if it makes you feel better about your stoopid self… :p
Diablo, Si!
LikeLiked by 1 person